-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 fix: centralize plugin key declaration #4390
🌱 fix: centralize plugin key declaration #4390
Conversation
Hi @mateusoliveira43. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@@ -31,21 +31,19 @@ import ( | |||
"sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v4/pkg/config/store/yaml" | |||
"sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v4/pkg/machinery" | |||
"sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v4/pkg/model/resource" | |||
"sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v4/pkg/plugin" | |||
"sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v4/pkg/plugin/util" | |||
"sigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v4/pkg/plugins/golang/deploy-image/v1alpha1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
separate PR, but deploy-image plugin folder should be v1alpha
instead of v1alpha1
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To change that, we would break our APIs
So, let's keep it as it is until the day that we need to create another API and etc
/hold saw that there multiple ways to call a plugin. Example: |
/ok-to-test |
Signed-off-by: Mateus Oliveira <msouzaol@redhat.com>
03ccaeb
to
9fa1285
Compare
/unhold |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked at the code it shows all fine 🥇
Also, it is passing in the tests and we still scaffolding the samples and all at the same way to it seems a quite improvement and we are face to fly 🚀
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, mateusoliveira43 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Why the changes were made
Fix #4309
How the changes were made
Ran these commands to find occurrences
ignoring test files.