generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 555
Update HTTPRoute BackendRef docs to clarify error behavior #1243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 12 commits into
kubernetes-sigs:main
from
youngnick:httproute-docs-update
Jul 12, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
567f901
Update HTTPRoute BackendRef docs to clarify error behavior
b61617d
Add new ResolvedRefs reasons
e012d5a
Add more invalid BackendRef conformance tests
17cc420
Update conformance tests
3d221db
Fix PR comments and update v1beta1 resources
bc22e52
Update generated YAML
238c1d4
Update conformance tests with Reasons
e041ecf
Fix spelling
477fde5
UFix PR comments
ac7d3f8
Fix some more PR comments
8abd902
Update helpers with PR feedback
49c0453
Fixing initialization for new conformance tests
robscott File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
66 changes: 34 additions & 32 deletions
66
config/crd/experimental/gateway.networking.k8s.io_httproutes.yaml
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this saying something different than "When a HTTPBackendRef is invalid, 500 status codes MUST be returned for"? They seem the same to me, and I wasn't sure if there was some subtle difference I was missing or if we were just re-iterating? Especially the "...also no filters..." part?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really in this update, no, but there are a few places where "no valid backends" and "some valid backends" were treated differently, and I wanted to make doubly sure that there's no confusion.