Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 (fix): Enable status subresource in ChaosPod example #2954

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

buraksekili
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes an issue on examples/crd controller.

  • adds marker to enable status subresource on the crd's api
  • fixes scheme initialization in the manager

Issue

At the moment, even though the reconciler works on ChaosPod instance's Status field, the status subresource is not enabled on ChaosPod. This commit adds // +kubebuilder:subresource:status marker to allow the generator tool to enable the status subresource on the custom resource definition.

Also, when the example manager starts, it fails due to scheme initialization as the registered types need to be added before starting the manager. Also, it misses corev1 scheme even though the controller owns Pods.

At the moment, even though reconciler works on ChaosPod instance's Status field, the status subresource is not enabled on ChaosPod. This commit adds `// +kubebuilder:subresource:status` marker to allow the generator tool to enable the status subresource on the custom resource definition.
…as to the current scheme and generate manager with this new populated scheme

Signed-off-by: Burak Sekili <buraksekili@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: buraksekili
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sbueringer for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @buraksekili. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants