-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add sharedvpc support for lb subnet #1280
add sharedvpc support for lb subnet #1280
Conversation
|
Welcome @swarren83! |
Hi @swarren83. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-gcp ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
/hold |
/easycla |
1ebb54b
to
5492ae7
Compare
/hold cancel |
please sign the cla /ok-to-test |
@cpanato I need to wait on merging this. I need to work on switching to the Corporate CLA. |
/hold cancel |
@cpanato Ready to proceed if this lgtm. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/assign @damdo
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, swarren83 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold for @damdo review as well |
Wanted to follow up on the status of this PR, @damdo do you have any additional requirements of me to earn your approval? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After testing this feature change, I believe that I was mistaken and we only need subnets to change the cloud scope.
0f16b9e
to
e6001db
Compare
@barbacbd I have reverted the changes to scope regional health checks and target tcp proxies. |
@swarren83 I would probably rebase it so that there is only one commit. Otherwise LGTM. @cpanato PTAL Thank you! |
fix: set cloudScope for regionalhc and tgttcpproxies add test for lb w/ shared vpc add more test cases revert regionlhc and targettcpproxies
e6001db
to
0207069
Compare
@barbacbd I rebased to a single commit as requested. Do we need anything else to get this ready to merge? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your PR @swarren83
/lgtm
/unhold
This picks up fix for shared VPC and labels, particularly: kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1280 kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1277 kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1275
This picks up fix for shared VPC and labels, particularly: kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1280 kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1277 kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1275
This picks up fix for shared VPC and labels, particularly: kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1280 kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1277 kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp#1275
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add support for SharedVPC when specifying
spec.loadBalancer.internalLoadBalancer.subnet
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #1279
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.
TODOs:
Release note: