Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Remove sorting from instance keys when creating input tag specifications #5063

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AlexVulaj
Copy link

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Currently when generating input tag specifications, we sort all of the keys from the given *infrav1.Instance before appending them to input.TagSpecifications. From the comments, this is done "for tests to work". This currently comes at the performance cost of iterating through all of the tags to grab the keys, and then sorting them before iterating the list again to add them to our input.

By utilizing a custom gomock.Matcher, we can transfer that performance hit from our production code to our tests.

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emojis
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority labels Jul 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @AlexVulaj!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-aws has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @AlexVulaj. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@AlexVulaj AlexVulaj changed the title Remove sorting from instance keys when creating input tag specifications ✨ Remove sorting from instance keys when creating input tag specifications Jul 19, 2024
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jul 21, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 21, 2024
@AlexVulaj AlexVulaj force-pushed the remove-instance-tag-sorting branch 2 times, most recently from 48073c7 to 23b7f2e Compare July 22, 2024 13:26
Copy link

@iamkirkbater iamkirkbater left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's been a while since I've been deep into coding world, but just saw two things that immediately stood out to me as potential problems down the road. Not sure if the one about the for loop matters in this case because I don't specifically remember the conditions in which it's "bad" but figured I'd bring it up.

pkg/cloud/services/ec2/instances.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/services/ec2/instances_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 22, 2024
@AlexVulaj AlexVulaj force-pushed the remove-instance-tag-sorting branch 2 times, most recently from 790646f to 5cf1138 Compare July 29, 2024 13:00
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign justinsb for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@AlexVulaj AlexVulaj force-pushed the remove-instance-tag-sorting branch from 5cf1138 to 1f7cd24 Compare July 29, 2024 13:40
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 16, 2024
Co-authored-by: Kirk Bater <kirk.bater@gmail.com>
@AlexVulaj
Copy link
Author

I rebased my PR today - not sure I understand the error in the PR Verify check but if anyone can point out what I need to do it'd be appreciated, thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-priority needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants