-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 629
Add ability to use NLBs as control plane load-balancers #3804
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cff8230
to
1f1a982
Compare
I just learned that you couldn't attach security groups to network load balancers. |
Almost there. :D It can't create the target group which I don't understand at all why because the error is super unhelpful.
It looks okay to me. :D |
IT WORKED! I have a working NLB! :D It was the health check, apparently; I'm not sure why yet. |
c157768
to
6dfd0f9
Compare
b5d43af
to
a7b9282
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comments.
Otherwise LGTM, great work 🎉
/lgtm |
cc @richardcase for final approval |
api/v1beta2/network_types.go
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to expose the V2
part in our API to the user?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will there be confusion with listener
and v2Listeners
? Guessing this could be coverted in the docs (which i haven't got to yet ;) )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question! I only exposed it because the other one was exposed as well. Do you think it's usually not needed at all? I'm happy not to include this at all. It doesn't seem like users would define extra listeners.
That said, there might be an option to add an extra health check or something... 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In any case, I renamed it. :)
And i should've said, looks great @Skarlso....excellent work. Most of my comments are nits. |
Also, totally forgot so say awesome work @Skarlso ❤️ 🙂. Only some nits. |
Thank you, all! :) |
140b19f
to
8c36924
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
I meant: /approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #3088
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Checklist: