Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 6, 2022. It is now read-only.

Replace forked KubernetesNamespaceLifecycle admission plugin with k8s.io/apiserver one #2258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2018
Merged

Replace forked KubernetesNamespaceLifecycle admission plugin with k8s.io/apiserver one #2258

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2018

Conversation

nilebox
Copy link
Contributor

@nilebox nilebox commented Aug 3, 2018

Fixes #2255

Since NamespaceLifecycle now exists in k8s.io/apiserver, there is no need to host a forked copy (which is currently outdated) anymore.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 3, 2018
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ spec:
- {{ .Values.apiserver.audit.logPath }}
{{- end}}
- --enable-admission-plugins
- "KubernetesNamespaceLifecycle,DefaultServicePlan,ServiceBindingsLifecycle,ServicePlanChangeValidator,BrokerAuthSarCheck"
- "NamespaceLifecycle,DefaultServicePlan,ServiceBindingsLifecycle,ServicePlanChangeValidator,BrokerAuthSarCheck"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nilebox nilebox Aug 3, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To double check, I simply made this change against the current release of Service Catalog running in my cluster, and it worked with no issues.

@jboyd01
Copy link
Contributor

jboyd01 commented Aug 3, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2018
@jboyd01 jboyd01 added the LGTM1 label Aug 3, 2018
@jeremyrickard
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jeremyrickard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2018
@jeremyrickard jeremyrickard self-requested a review August 3, 2018 14:33
Copy link
Contributor

@jeremyrickard jeremyrickard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. LGTM1 LGTM2 size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot delete ServiceInstance when namespace is missing
4 participants