Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@codinja1188
Copy link
Contributor

@codinja1188 codinja1188 commented Jul 31, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:
Updated component-base/logs instead of old logging style.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes # #546

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Vasubabu!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-packet 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-packet has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 31, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@cprivitere cprivitere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll want to try compiling this locally first before pushing. There's definitely an extra definition of pflag here and I imagine a make generate needs to be run too.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 31, 2023
main.go Outdated

cliflag "k8s.io/component-base/cli/flag"
"k8s.io/component-base/logs"
v1 "k8s.io/component-base/logs/api/v1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you know why we don't need the _ "k8s.io/component-base/logs/json/register" line they had in the original code suggestion?

Also, can we call this something other than v1. I'd prefer something like logsv1.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@codinja1188 codinja1188 force-pushed the capi-logs branch 2 times, most recently from 7eb5286 to cccdca7 Compare August 2, 2023 14:16
@cprivitere
Copy link
Contributor

For reference, here's the upstream change that started normalizing flag input: sbueringer/cluster-api@21740cb

Seems like a good thing to do.

Copy link
Contributor

@cprivitere cprivitere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change line 106 from

	ctrl.SetLogger(klogr.New())

to

	// klog.Background will automatically use the right logger.
	ctrl.SetLogger(klog.Background())

This is per another upstream change that they got in later.

@cprivitere
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 2, 2023
@cprivitere
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cprivitere, vasubabu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d0f9855 into kubernetes-retired:main Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants