-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Add macos to the matrix build. #2017
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: brendandburns The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
57f5210
to
6161a56
Compare
4107cf4
to
48b9ca3
Compare
2ede76e
to
fdea0ff
Compare
/hold waiting for flake fixes to merge |
08338b1
to
5940b43
Compare
/hold remove @yue9944882 this is ready for review. I changed one of the leader election tests, please check my changes and make sure they make sense. |
@@ -274,6 +277,36 @@ private void assertHistory(List<String> history, String... expected) { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// assertWildcardHistory allows for an arbitrary number of repeated entries for an | |||
// comparison with a '+' suffix. This allows for a semantic rather than literal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: in the sense of regex, i think *
is more accurate than +
here according to the description
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think the ideal way to implement wildcard matching is by converting it to an FSM, but a minimal viable hard-coded wildcard also lgtm
/lgtm
Fixes #1218