Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Samples - Improved the TFX OSS notebook and README #922

Merged

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Mar 6, 2019

Addressed the issues described here: #913


This change is Reviewable

Addressed the issues described here: kubeflow#913
Copy link
Contributor

@neuromage neuromage left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @Ark-kun !

/lgtm

samples/tfx-oss/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
samples/tfx-oss/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@neuromage neuromage left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks again!

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Mar 6, 2019

/approve

@cjwagner
Copy link
Member

cjwagner commented Mar 7, 2019

/hold

Holding this PR because it has a non-successful GitHub check which is preventing Tide from merging because Tide does not respect GitHub checks (only GitHub status contexts). This is blocking automated merge to this repo.

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Mar 7, 2019

Holding this PR because it has a non-successful GitHub check which is preventing Tide from merging

@cjwagner
Can you point me to any unsuccessful check?

@Ark-kun Ark-kun force-pushed the Improved-the-TFX-OSS-notebook-and-README branch from 777a022 to e02f7c4 Compare March 7, 2019 08:48
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Mar 7, 2019
@cjwagner
Copy link
Member

cjwagner commented Mar 7, 2019

Can you point me to any unsuccessful check?

The check was in the pending state when I wrote that message. It appears to be successful now so Tide might be able to merge now. That being said Tide doesn't respect GH checks so the behavior is undefined and the checks really should not be enabled on this repo at all. I opened an issue for that: #930

@neuromage
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Mar 7, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8208510 into kubeflow:master Mar 7, 2019
@Ark-kun Ark-kun changed the title Improved the TFX OSS notebook and README Samples - Improved the TFX OSS notebook and README Mar 8, 2019
cheyang pushed a commit to alibaba/pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2019
* Improved the TFX OSS notebook and README
Addressed the issues described here: kubeflow#913

* Addressed the PR feedback.
@Ark-kun Ark-kun deleted the Improved-the-TFX-OSS-notebook-and-README branch March 29, 2019 23:27
HumairAK pushed a commit to red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants