Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show all run outputs in dedicated tab #496

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 7, 2018

Conversation

yebrahim
Copy link
Contributor

@yebrahim yebrahim commented Dec 7, 2018

Fixes #331.
Fixes #92.


This change is Reviewable

@yebrahim
Copy link
Contributor Author

yebrahim commented Dec 7, 2018

/assign rileyjbauer
/label area/front-end

@yebrahim
Copy link
Contributor Author

yebrahim commented Dec 7, 2018

/test kubeflow-pipeline-build-image

if (workflow && workflow.status && workflow.status.nodes) {
Object.keys(workflow.status.nodes).forEach(n =>
outputPaths = outputPaths.concat(this.loadNodeOutputPaths(workflow.status.nodes[n])));
this.loadNodeOutputPaths(workflow.status.nodes[n]).map(path =>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't wait for a better way to iterate over values in a map like this 😷

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we want an easier way. I found that lodash has map and iteratee methods that can be used here, but they don't actually look more readable.

frontend/src/pages/RunDetails.test.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
frontend/src/pages/RunDetails.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rileyjbauer rileyjbauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rileyjbauer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rileyjbauer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rileyjbauer
Copy link
Contributor

/label area/front-end

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ee8c38f into kubeflow:master Dec 7, 2018
@yebrahim yebrahim deleted the run-outputs branch December 8, 2018 01:04
neuromage pushed a commit to neuromage/pipelines that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2018
* wip, showing outputs with no labels

* showing outputs with step labels

* wip fixing tests

* fix tests

* test new functionality

* global tree

* add empty message

* pr comments
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
* Other workflows are using test_py_lint and making it a pytest breaks them.

* Create a new version py_lint_test.py for people that want to migrate.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants