SDK - Fix SDK on Python 3.8

[Ark-kun]

Fixes the follwoing error: "TypeError: code() takes at least 14 arguments (13 given)".

The cause of the issue is a breaking change in CodeType constructor in Python 3.8.
https://bugs.python.org/issue37221
This should have been fixed by python/cpython#13959 and python/cpython#14505, but the code still fails.

Fixes #2952

---

This change is 

[pablogsal]

This should have been fixed by python/cpython#13959 and python/cpython#14505, but the code still fails.

Hi, CPython core dev here ✋

Those PRs did not intend to change back the CodeType constructor. As I said in python/cpython#12701 (comment):

Also, types.CodeType's constructor is considered private. We now even have this warning in the docs (https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/types.html#standard-interpreter-types):

If you instantiate any of these types, note that signatures may vary between Python versions.

Additionally, you have now available types.CodeType.replace in case you can to create a copy with some fields changed.

[Ark-kun]

Hi, CPython core dev here

Those PRs did not intend to change back the CodeType constructor. As I said in python/cpython#12701 (comment):

Also, types.CodeType's constructor is considered private. We now even have this warning in the docs (https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/types.html#standard-interpreter-types):

If you instantiate any of these types, note that signatures may vary between Python versions.

Thank you for the explanation!
I hope in future we'll have a more stable API for dynamic function generation.

[Ark-kun]

@numerology Can you please take a look?
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• sdk/OWNERS [Ark-kun]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[numerology]

/lgtm