Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backend] Patch default bucket name and project ID #2938

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Jan 31, 2020

Conversation

numerology
Copy link

@numerology numerology commented Jan 30, 2020

Depends on #2932 .

Test pending
Verified it's working at https://736bf3ceb05ded92-dot-us-central2.pipelines.googleusercontent.com/#/pipelines


This change is Reviewable

@numerology numerology changed the title [WIP] Patch default bucket name and project ID [Backend] Patch default bucket name and project ID Jan 30, 2020
@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

@numerology
Copy link
Author

/assign @IronPan
/assign @neuromage
/assign @rmgogogo

backend/src/apiserver/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
backend/src/apiserver/main.go Show resolved Hide resolved
}
pipelineFile, err = server.PatchPipelineDefaultParameter(pipelineFile, patchMap)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to patch default value to %s. Error: %v", config.Name, err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If patching fails, will APIserver keep restarting?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it does. Do you recommend swallow the error? IMO patching should work unless user configured something in the wrong way. Thanks!

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jan 31, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@numerology
Copy link
Author

/retest

@neuromage
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: neuromage

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@numerology
Copy link
Author

/test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jan 31, 2020

/test kubeflow-pipeline-frontend-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3c6ee19 into kubeflow:master Jan 31, 2020
@numerology numerology deleted the patch-default-gcs branch February 1, 2020 04:25
Jeffwan pushed a commit to Jeffwan/pipelines that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
* update branch

* add env var

* update api-server

* populate default value

* lint

* bump build rule

* bump build rule

* bump travis bazel version

* fix

* Revert "bump travis bazel version"

This reverts commit 92db384

* Revert "bump build rule"

This reverts commit be2bd7b

* Revert "bump build rule"

This reverts commit 78926e3

* Revert "fix"

This reverts commit 963e64b

* fix

* patch all the samples

* unittest

* fix tests

* minor fix

* style change

* clean up
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants