Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK - Components - Added type to graph input references #2451

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Oct 21, 2019

This allows overriding the data type when passing the graph input as an argument and makes the graph input references consistent with task output references.
This is a breaking change, but the graph components are not exposed in the documentation or samples yet, so it should be fine.


This change is Reviewable

This makes the graph input references consistent with task output references.
This is a breaking change, but the graph components are not exposed in the documentation or samples yet.
Copy link

@numerology numerology left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Left one nit comment.

sdk/python/kfp/components/_structures.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Oct 23, 2019
@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Oct 23, 2019

@numerology Can you re-LGTM? I had to fix merge conflict.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@numerology
Copy link

/lgtm

@Katharine
Copy link

/hold

This is causing prow issues due to it attempting to merge despite the failing travis CI

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Oct 23, 2019

This is causing prow issues due to it attempting to merge despite the failing travis CI

Sorry about that. The test failed due to network.

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 681d873 into kubeflow:master Oct 24, 2019
@cjwagner
Copy link
Member

ref: #930

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants