Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK - Testing - Run some unit-tests in a more correct way #2036

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Sep 4, 2019

Replaced @unittest.expectedFailure with with self.assertRaises(...):.
Replaced assert with self.assertEqual(...).
Stopped producing the stray "comp.yaml" file.
Enabled the test_load_component_from_url test.


This change is Reviewable

Replaced `@unittest.expectedFailure` with `with self.assertRaises(...):`.
Replaced `assert` with `self.assertEqual(...)`.
Stopped producing the stray "comp.yaml" file.
Enabled the test_load_component_from_url test.
@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Sep 4, 2019

/retest

@numerology
Copy link

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Sep 6, 2019
@numerology
Copy link

/lgtm

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Sep 6, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@chases2
Copy link

chases2 commented Sep 6, 2019

/hold

There's an issue with getting this to merge.
failed merging [2036]: [PR is unmergable. Do the Tide merge requirements match the GitHub settings for the repo? Required status check "Travis CI - Pull Request" is queued.]

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Sep 6, 2019

@chases2 Is it possible to fix the issue on our side or the only way is to stop using Travis?

@Ark-kun Ark-kun force-pushed the SDK---Testing---Run-some-unit-tests-in-a-more-correct-way branch from 979a70d to 55adcc4 Compare September 6, 2019 20:05
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Sep 6, 2019
@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Sep 6, 2019

/hold cancel

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Sep 6, 2019

@numerology Can you please re-LGTM - Travis checks have malfunctioned again.

@numerology
Copy link

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a3c83f5 into kubeflow:master Sep 10, 2019
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
kubeflow#2036)

Bumps [tensorflow](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow) from 2.5.2 to 2.5.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](tensorflow/tensorflow@v2.5.2...v2.5.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: tensorflow
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants