Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

openvino predict component and pipeline example #180

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 16, 2018

Conversation

dtrawins
Copy link
Contributor

@dtrawins dtrawins commented Nov 9, 2018

This change is Reviewable

@googlebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dtrawins. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dtrawins. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 278

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 67.592%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 151: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1535
Relevant Lines: 2179

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 153

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 67.592%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 151: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1535
Relevant Lines: 2179

💛 - Coveralls

@dtrawins
Copy link
Contributor Author

dtrawins commented Nov 9, 2018

I signed it!

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 10, 2018

Hi @dtrawins,

The comments from one of the robots above provide details instructions on how to pass the CLA check.

See the comment starting with:

"Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA)."

Thank you!

@dtrawins
Copy link
Contributor Author

I should be now in the required CLA group. Could you revalidate it now?

@googlebot
Copy link
Collaborator

CLAs look good, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@vicaire vicaire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me as well. Could you please just move the component to /contrib/components/openvino?

Thanks!

@dtrawins
Copy link
Contributor Author

component path changed to contrib/components/openvino as requested

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 16, 2018

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@vicaire vicaire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, there seems to be two more files in the samples directory. Could we move them to the /contrib directory as well?

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
import kfp.dsl as dsl

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is still in the /samples directory. Could we move it to the /contrib directory?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

samples are now also moved to contrib

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# OpenVINO predict pipeline

This is an example of simple one step pipeline implementation including OpenVINO predict component.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is still in the /samples directory. Could we move it to the /contrib directory?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

samples are now also moved to contrib

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 16, 2018

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicaire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicaire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 16, 2018

Bypassing the e2e tests since they are not affected by these changes.

@vicaire vicaire merged commit 14a0260 into kubeflow:master Nov 16, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtrawins: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
presubmit-unit-test 27468b1 link /test presubmit-unit-test
build-image 27468b1 link /test build-image

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…beflow#180)

* Modified run_e2etest script

* Add more logs

* Use util to get changed files

* Add logs

* Change git diff command

* Fix broken tests

* Fix broken tests

* Testing with a fake prow_config

* Remove verbose logs

* Fix script error

* Revert prow_config

* Update README.md

* Change job_types and include_dirs to arrays

* Remove obsolete test

* Fix lint error

* Fix comments and argument parsing
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
* apply pylint testing for kfserving python code

* fix some pylint errors
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants