Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding myself as a reviewer for components #1161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2019

Conversation

animeshsingh
Copy link
Contributor

@animeshsingh animeshsingh commented Apr 12, 2019

Have been reviewing many components and sample related PRs, and feel pretty confident addressing them


This change is Reviewable

Have been reviewing many components and sample related PRs, and feel pretty confident addressing them
@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Apr 15, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot assigned vicaire and unassigned vicaire Apr 15, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicaire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicaire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@animeshsingh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test a320ff3 link /test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@vicaire vicaire merged commit d24dba5 into kubeflow:master Apr 15, 2019
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
* WIP: Add torchserve to v1beta1 spec

 - Add torchserve sample
 - Add Readme document
 - Update pytorch image in inferenceservice configmap

* Feature: Add model archiver for torchserve

* Feature: Add Readme for canary and autoscaling

* Fix: Removed "strconv" unused pkg

* Revert "Feature: Add model archiver for torchserve"

This reverts commit d1f7e37d59e3c0023e1b5f655d7da80960aacca8.

* Feature: Add mnist example with image transformer for torchserve

* Feature: Add support for torchserve along with pytorchserver

* Fix: Update deployment yaml files

* Feature: Add testcase for torchserve predictor

* Revert "Feature: Add testcase for torchserve predictor"

This reverts commit d0cc3d15c54630e122e1d21c5ea73d8242437f30.

* Fix: Update readme, test inference config, torchserve predictor

 - fix canary and autoscaling readme
 - fix test inference configmap
 - fix torchserve verison check for modelclassname
 - fix inference service conversion

* Fix: Update readme and yaml for torchserve predictor request, response

* Fix: Update yaml, readme and predictor images

 - update predictor images in inference config
 - update kfserving version in image transformer
 - fix image transformer docker file
 - fix deployment yaml with prebuilt marfile
 - fix readme doc

* Fix: Update transformer yaml and ci fix

* Feature: Add test case for torchserve predictor

 - fix protocol validation for model class name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants