Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK/Components - Handling public GCS URIs in load_component_from_url #1057

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Mar 28, 2019

Adds support for handling public gs:// links in load_component_from_url.


This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@hongye-sun hongye-sun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

sdk/python/kfp/components/_components.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Mar 28, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 291691a into kubeflow:master Mar 28, 2019
@Ark-kun Ark-kun deleted the SDK/Components---Handling-public-GCS-URIs-in-load_component branch March 29, 2019 21:43
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
* Puller streamlining/simplification

Follow-on changes to kubeflow#989 based on remaining review suggestions.

- Simplified configmap change diffing
- Connect watcher and puller with event channel
- Have puller track in-progress ops per model via op completion channel and tie lifecycle of per-model channel+goroutine pairs to this

* Minor change: fully decouple puller from watcher

* Address some of the review comments

The complete ModelOp struct is now passed all the way back and forth.
HumairAK pushed a commit to red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants