blog: Kubeflow and GSoC 2025 blog #183
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Akash Jaiswal <akashjaiswal3846@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akash Jaiswal <akashjaiswal3846@gmail.com>
google-oss-prow
bot
requested review from
franciscojavierarceo and
juliusvonkohout
Signed-off-by: Xinmin Du <2812493086@qq.com>
Doris-xm
force-pushed
the
kubeflow-gsoc25
branch
from
7139ddc to
28643c7
Compare
Signed-off-by: kunal-511 <yoyokvunal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshvir Potpose <hpotpose62@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: kunal-511 <yoyokvunal@gmail.com>
kunal-511
force-pushed
the
kubeflow-gsoc25
branch
from
48e4ac4 to
5f4a065
Compare
|
@varodrig for review |
Updated mentor information and added project outcomes. Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: madmecodes <ayushguptadev1@gmail.com>
Added details about Project 5: JupyterLab Plugin for Kubeflow, including contributor, mentors, overview, key outcomes, and resources. Signed-off-by: Amrit Kumar <60445581+Amrit27k@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Amrit Kumar <60445581+Amrit27k@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Hi @kaikaila @fresende Can you please add your project to this PR? Related slack discussion: https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C0742LBR5BM/p1760876548016539 |
Signed-off-by: Harshit Nayan <harshitacademia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshit Nayan <harshitacademia@gmail.com>
|
Please ping me when this is ready and i can approve |
Signed-off-by: SanthoshToorpu <toorpusanthosh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akash Jaiswal <akashjaiswal3846@gmail.com>
|
Here are the current details: Completed Projects: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12 I’ve already reached out to and tagged the contributors earlier, but haven’t received any response yet. |
| - Eliminated MinIO's licensing constraints by adopting SeaweedFS's more permissive license model | ||
| - Implemented comprehensive CI tests for SeaweedFS deployment and namespace isolation functionality | ||
| - Strengthened the manifests repository's CI pipeline and contributed to the dashboard migration efforts | ||
| - Enforcing PodSecurityStandars baseline/restricted |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - Enforcing PodSecurityStandars baseline/restricted | |
| - Enforcing PodSecurityStandards baseline/restricted |
| This project focused on creating component-based Helm charts for Kubeflow, enabling flexible and incremental deployment of ML infrastructure. Instead of requiring a full platform installation, users can now deploy specific components like Katib, Pipelines, Model Registry, and others independently with customized configurations. | ||
|
|
||
| **Key Outcomes:** | ||
| - Kubeflow AI reference paltform end to end testing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - Kubeflow AI reference paltform end to end testing | |
| - Kubeflow AI reference platform end to end testing |
|  | ||
|
|
||
| **Overview:** | ||
| We had a few examples in the repository that we wanted to include in our end-to-end (E2E) tests, but all of them were CPU-based. Projects like Torchune and Qwen 2.5, for instance, require GPU resources to run — yet our existing CI setup couldn’t validate them at all because it was entirely CPU-focused. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| We had a few examples in the repository that we wanted to include in our end-to-end (E2E) tests, but all of them were CPU-based. Projects like Torchune and Qwen 2.5, for instance, require GPU resources to run — yet our existing CI setup couldn’t validate them at all because it was entirely CPU-focused. | |
| We had a few examples in the repository that we wanted to include in our end-to-end (E2E) tests, but all of them were CPU-based. Projects like TorchTune and Qwen 2.5, for instance, require GPU resources to run — yet our existing CI setup couldn’t validate them at all because it was entirely CPU-focused. |
|
looks great. Thank you for working on this. |
Signed-off-by: Akash Jaiswal <akashjaiswal3846@gmail.com>
|
Hi @varodrig did the changes. |
Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
|
to me it looks good enough on a high level. /lgtm @akagami-harsh @LogicalGuy77 @madmecodes @kunal-511 and other students please complain here if you do not agree with the text. |
|
So feel free to merge if we do not here complaints in the next 24 hours @varodrig, the PR is already 3 weeks old. |
Signed-off-by: Fellipe Resende <fellipe.barros.resende@gmail.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
12 participants
What does this PR do?
This PR aims to add all the 9 project which were part of GSoC 2025. We wanted to show the community what our contributors, along with guidance of mentors have achieved in last 3-4 months of summer. Hopeful that this would be helpful for upcoming contributors as well.
Fixes #182