support sharding virtual kubelet, fix bugs exposed in pressure test #15
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily enhance the configurability and functionality of the application by introducing environment variable support, updating logging mechanisms, and refining data structures. Key modifications include the addition of new types and constants, the renaming of existing functions and methods, and improvements to test coverage. The updates also involve changes to the MQTT tunnel's message handling and the introduction of new methods for managing node states. Overall, these changes collectively improve the application's adaptability and clarity. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
common/model/model.go (2)
49-51: LGTM! Consider adding comments for the new types.The new type definitions
ArkSimpleAllBizInfoDataandArkSimpleBizInfoDatalook good and seem to provide a flexible way to store simplified business information.To improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding comments to describe the purpose and usage of these new types. For example:
// ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData represents a collection of simplified business information datasets. type ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData []ArkSimpleBizInfoData // ArkSimpleBizInfoData represents a single simplified business information dataset as a collection of strings. type ArkSimpleBizInfoData []stringThis will help other developers understand the intended use of these types more easily.
49-51: Request: Provide context for the new type additions.The new type definitions
ArkSimpleAllBizInfoDataandArkSimpleBizInfoDataseem to be part of a larger change to support simplified business information handling. To better understand the impact and purpose of these changes:
- Could you provide more context on how these new types relate to the PR objective of "support sharding virtual kubelet, fix bugs exposed in pressure test"?
- Are there any specific use cases or scenarios where these new types will be particularly useful?
This additional information will help ensure that the changes align well with the overall project goals and architecture.
report_server/server.go (1)
Incomplete utilization of
logrusand potential silent failuresThe
report_server/server.gofile still uses the standardlog.Printlninstead of fully leveraging the introducedlogruspackage. This inconsistency can lead to unstructured logs and may introduce silent failures due to inconsistent error handling.
- Replace remaining
log.Printlnstatements withlogrusequivalents to ensure consistent and structured logging.- Review and update error handling to utilize
logrusfor better traceability and debugging.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-104: Summary and clarification needed on PR objectivesThe changes in this file introduce the
logruspackage for structured logging and modify the error handling for server startup. While these are steps in the right direction for improving logging and error handling, there are a few concerns:
- The
logruspackage is not fully utilized throughout the file.- The change in error handling for server startup could potentially lead to silent failures.
Could you please clarify how these changes relate to the PR objective of "fix bugs exposed in pressure test"? It's not immediately clear how these modifications address specific issues that may have been uncovered during pressure testing.
Additionally, to ensure we haven't missed any related changes, could you confirm if there are any other files in the PR that modify logging or error handling? You can use the following command to check:
This will help us understand the full scope of the logging and error handling changes across the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for files that import logrus or modify error handling rg --type go -e 'github.com/sirupsen/logrus' -e 'log\.' -e 'err :='Length of output: 8072
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract all logrus logging statements and error handling in report_server/server.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'log\.(G|WithError|Info|Error|Warn|Debug|Infof|Errorf)\($_\)' report_server/server.goLength of output: 461
common/utils/utils.go (2)
105-124: Consider checking for nilBizStateRecordsinTranslateBizInfosToContainerStatusesIn the function
TranslateBizInfosToContainerStatuses, when callingGetLatestState(bizInfo.BizState, bizInfo.BizStateRecords), ensure thatbizInfo.BizStateRecordsis notnilto prevent potentialnilpointer dereference errors. This will enhance the robustness of your code.
126-136: Add unit tests for new translation functionsConsider adding unit tests for
TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfosto ensure it correctly handles various input scenarios, including edge cases with invalid or unexpected data. This will improve code reliability and maintainability.Would you like assistance in generating these unit tests or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
common/utils/utils_test.go (2)
330-330: Update Comment to Match the Tested FunctionThe comment above the test function does not match the function being tested. Update the comment to accurately reflect the test cases for
TranslateBizInfosToContainerStatuses.Apply this diff to correct the comment:
-// Test cases for TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos function +// Test cases for TranslateBizInfosToContainerStatuses function
612-612: Consider Enhancing the Test AssertionsCurrently, the test only checks if the length of the result is
1. To enhance test coverage, consider asserting the actual contents ofresultagainst the expected values.Here's an example of how you can improve the assertions:
if len(result) != 1 { t.Errorf("TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) } +if !reflect.DeepEqual(result, tc.expected) { + t.Errorf("TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos(%s) result mismatch:\ngot %+v\nwant %+v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- cmd/module-controller/main.go (3 hunks)
- common/model/consts.go (1 hunks)
- common/model/model.go (1 hunks)
- common/utils/utils.go (1 hunks)
- common/utils/utils_test.go (5 hunks)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (9 hunks)
- report_server/server.go (2 hunks)
- suite/base_lifecycle_test.go (2 hunks)
- suite/mock_base.go (1 hunks)
- suite/module_lifecycle_test.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (25)
common/model/consts.go (1)
40-41: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The renaming of
BaseBizTopictoBaseSimpleBizTopicand the addition ofBaseAllBizTopicimprove the clarity and flexibility of the topic structure. This change aligns well with the PR objective of supporting sharding in virtual kubelet by providing more granular control over topic selection.To ensure a smooth transition, please verify the usage of these constants across the codebase. Run the following script to check for any remaining uses of the old constant name and to identify where the new constants are being used:
This will help ensure that all necessary updates have been made and that the new constants are being used appropriately.
✅ Verification successful
Verified!
The
BaseBizTopicconstant has been successfully renamed toBaseSimpleBizTopic, and the new constantBaseAllBizTopicis properly utilized within the codebase. No remaining references toBaseBizTopicwere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of renamed and new constants # Check for any remaining uses of the old constant name echo "Checking for any remaining uses of BaseBizTopic:" rg --type go "BaseBizTopic" # Check usage of the new constant names echo "Checking usage of BaseSimpleBizTopic:" rg --type go "BaseSimpleBizTopic" echo "Checking usage of BaseAllBizTopic:" rg --type go "BaseAllBizTopic"Length of output: 1096
suite/base_lifecycle_test.go (3)
37-37: Consider the implications of increased timeoutThe timeout for this
Eventuallyassertion has been increased from 20 seconds to 50 seconds. While this change may resolve intermittent test failures, it's important to consider the following:
- The increased timeout might mask underlying performance issues or slow operations that should be optimized.
- Longer timeouts can significantly increase the overall test execution time, especially if there are many such assertions.
To better understand the necessity of this change, let's analyze the test execution times:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze test execution times for base_lifecycle_test.go # Run the tests with verbose output and capture execution times go test -v ./suite -run TestBaseLifecycle 2>&1 | grep -E "^=== RUN|^--- PASS" # Check if there are any slow tests (taking more than 10 seconds) echo "Slow tests (>10s):" go test -v ./suite -run TestBaseLifecycle 2>&1 | grep -E "^--- PASS" | awk '{if ($3 > 10.0) print $0}'Please review the script output to determine if the increased timeout is necessary or if there are underlying performance issues that need to be addressed.
45-48: Ensure consistency in FormatNodeName usage and review timeout increase
The change to
utils.FormatNodeName(nodeID, env)is consistent with the earlier modification in this file, which is good for maintaining code consistency.The timeout for this
Eventuallyassertion has also been increased from 30 seconds to 50 seconds. This change aligns with the previous timeout increase but raises similar concerns:
- It may hide potential performance issues in the node deletion process.
- It contributes to longer overall test execution times.
To better understand the impact of these changes, let's analyze the node deletion process:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze node deletion process # Search for node deletion logic echo "Node deletion logic:" rg --type go "DeleteNode" -A 5 # Check for any error handling or logging related to node deletion echo "Error handling in node deletion:" rg --type go "DeleteNode.*err\s*:?=" -A 3Please review the script output to ensure that:
- The node deletion process is optimized and doesn't unnecessarily contribute to longer test execution times.
- There's appropriate error handling and logging in place to help diagnose any issues that might be masked by the increased timeout.
Consider adding more granular logging or metrics to track the duration of the node deletion process, which could help identify potential bottlenecks without relying solely on increased timeouts.
27-27: Verify theenvvariable and update other occurrences ofFormatNodeNameThe
utils.FormatNodeNamefunction now includes anenvparameter, which is a good improvement for environment-aware node naming. However, there are a couple of points to address:
- The
envvariable is not defined in the visible part of this file. Ensure it's properly declared and initialized before use.- This change might affect other parts of the codebase that use the
FormatNodeNamefunction.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
Please review the script output and update other occurrences of
FormatNodeNameif necessary. Also, ensure thatenvis properly defined in this file.common/model/model.go (1)
49-51: Verify the usage of new types across the codebase.While the new type definitions look good, it's important to ensure they are being used correctly and consistently throughout the codebase.
Let's run a script to check for any usage of these new types:
This will help us understand how these new types are being utilized and ensure they are implemented correctly in other parts of the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Usage of new types has been verified and is consistent across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new types ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData and ArkSimpleBizInfoData echo "Searching for ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData usage:" rg --type go "ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData" echo "\nSearching for ArkSimpleBizInfoData usage:" rg --type go "ArkSimpleBizInfoData"Length of output: 1100
go.mod (1)
20-20: Verify the necessity of the new indirect dependency.A new indirect dependency
k8s.io/utils v0.0.0-20240711033017-18e509b52bc8has been added to the module.Please ensure the following:
- Verify if this addition is intentional and necessary for the project.
- Check which direct dependency might be requiring this package.
- Consider if this new dependency might introduce any conflicts or security concerns.
#!/bin/bash # List direct dependencies that might be using k8s.io/utils echo "Direct dependencies that might be using k8s.io/utils:" grep -R "k8s.io/utils" vendor 2>/dev/null | cut -d: -f1 | xargs -n1 dirname | sort -u | sed 's/vendor\///'suite/module_lifecycle_test.go (5)
29-29: LGTM. Consistent with the refactoring.The update to use
utils.FormatNodeName(nodeID, env)in thek8sClient.Getcall is consistent with the overall changes and ensures that the correct node name is used when querying the Kubernetes API.
51-51: LGTM. Consistent with the refactoring.The update to use
utils.FormatNodeName(nodeID, env)in the condition for checking the pod's node name is consistent with the overall changes. This ensures that the correct node name is used when verifying the pod's assigned node.
109-109: LGTM. Consistent with the refactoring.The update to use
utils.FormatNodeName(nodeID, env)in thek8sClient.Getcall for retrieving the node is consistent with the overall changes. This ensures that the correct node name is used when querying the Kubernetes API for the node's status.
Line range hint
1-113: Overall LGTM. Consistent refactoring, but verifyenvvariable.The changes in this file consistently update the node name formatting to include the
envparameter across all relevant function calls. This refactoring aligns with the provided summary and appears to be part of a larger effort to include environment information in node names.However, there's one potential issue to address:
The
envvariable is not defined or initialized in the visible part of the file. Please ensure that it's properly defined, either in this file or imported from another module.To verify the
envvariable, please check the results of the previously suggested script or provide the necessary context for its definition.
21-21: LGTM. Verify theenvvariable.The change to include the
envparameter inutils.FormatNodeNameis consistent with the described modifications. However, ensure that theenvvariable is properly defined and initialized before this line.To verify the
envvariable, run the following script:suite/mock_base.go (1)
Line range hint
1-294: Overall assessment of changes insuite/mock_base.goThe changes introduced in this file enhance the
SetBizStatemethod by adding functionality to send simplified business information. This addition improves the mock base's ability to simulate real-world scenarios and provides more comprehensive data for testing purposes.While the implementation is generally sound, there are opportunities for minor improvements in error handling, code clarity, and execution logic. These suggestions have been outlined in the previous comment.
Despite these minor points, the changes align well with the PR objectives of supporting sharding virtual kubelet and fixing bugs exposed in pressure tests. The new functionality adds more detailed state reporting, which can be valuable for debugging and monitoring in a distributed system.
cmd/module-controller/main.go (1)
80-80: Verify that disabling the metrics server is intentional.Setting
BindAddressto"0"disables the metrics server. Please confirm that this behavior is desired.module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (7)
19-19: Importing necessary package for error handlingThe import of
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/errors"is required for Kubernetes API error checks, such aserrors.IsNotFound(err), used in the code.
58-60: Subscribing to new MQTT topics for business dataThe subscriptions to
BaseSimpleBizTopicandBaseAllBizTopicenable the tunnel to receive additional business data from nodes. Ensure that the corresponding callbacks (bizMsgCallbackandallBizMsgCallback) handle the incoming messages appropriately.
71-73: Unsubscribing from MQTT topics when a node stopsThe unsubscriptions from
BaseSimpleBizTopicandBaseAllBizTopicensure that the tunnel stops receiving messages related to a node that has stopped, preventing unnecessary processing.
Line range hint
225-239: Updated data type in bizMsgCallback and adjusted processing logicThe data type in
bizMsgCallbackhas been updated tomodel.ArkMqttMsg[model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData], and the processing logic now usesTranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos. This change aligns with the new message format and ensures correct data handling.
241-256: Added allBizMsgCallback to handle comprehensive business dataThe new
allBizMsgCallbackmethod processes messages fromBaseAllBizTopic, unmarshalling the payload and invokingonQueryAllBizDataArrived. This addition enhances the tunnel's ability to handle comprehensive business data updates.
304-314:⚠️ Potential issueCommented out cache checks may lead to redundant installations
In the
StartContainermethod, the code that checks the module cache to prevent redundant installations has been commented out. This could cause the system to attempt to install modules that are already active, potentially leading to unnecessary operations or conflicts.Determine if bypassing the cache checks is intentional. If the cache is deprecated or unreliable, ensure that the system can handle redundant installation attempts gracefully. Otherwise, consider reinstating or updating the cache verification logic.
317-327:⚠️ Potential issueCommented out cache checks may cause unnecessary uninstallation attempts
In the
ShutdownContainermethod, the cache check that verifies the existence of the module before uninstallation has been commented out. This could lead to attempts to uninstall modules that are not present, resulting in errors or unnecessary processing.Assess whether omitting the cache checks is appropriate. If module existence checks are still necessary, consider re-enabling or updating this logic to prevent potential issues.
common/utils/utils_test.go (5)
8-8: Approved Addition of 'assert' PackageThe addition of the
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"import is appropriate. Utilizing theassertpackage enhances the readability and consistency of test cases.
10-10: Approved Addition of 'resource' PackageIncluding
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource"is necessary for handling resource quantities in the tests. This import is correctly added.
627-637: Approved Implementation of Test CasesThe test cases for
GetArkBizStateFromSimpleBizStateare comprehensive and cover various input scenarios, including unexpected values.
641-649: Handle Empty 'ChangeTime' GracefullyIn
TestGetLatestState_ChangeTimeLenLt3, ensure that the functionGetLatestStatesafely handles cases whereChangeTimeis empty. The test accurately checks for zeroed time and empty reason and message.
330-330:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate Test Function Name to Reflect Renamed Function
The test function name
TestTranslateQueryAllBizDataToContainerStatusesshould be updated toTestTranslateBizInfosToContainerStatusesto align with the renamed functionTranslateBizInfosToContainerStatuses.Apply this diff to update the test function name:
-func TestTranslateQueryAllBizDataToContainerStatuses(t *testing.T) { +func TestTranslateBizInfosToContainerStatuses(t *testing.T) {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| log.Println("Starting server on :8080") | ||
| if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil); err != nil { | ||
| log.Fatalf("Server failed: %v", err) | ||
| logrus.Errorf("Server failed: %v", err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider error handling for server startup failure
The change from log.Fatalf to logrus.Errorf alters the behavior of the application when the server fails to start. Previously, the program would terminate, but now it will continue executing. This could lead to undefined behavior if other parts of the application depend on the server being operational.
Consider one of the following approaches:
-
If termination is desired (recommended):
if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil); err != nil { logrus.Fatalf("Server failed to start: %v", err) }
-
If graceful handling is preferred:
if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil); err != nil { logrus.Errorf("Server failed to start: %v", err) // Implement appropriate error handling or recovery logic here }
Please choose the approach that best fits the application's requirements and error handling strategy.
| "encoding/json" | ||
| "fmt" | ||
| "github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet/common/utils" | ||
| "github.com/sirupsen/logrus" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider replacing all log package usage with logrus
The addition of the logrus package is a good step towards structured logging. However, for consistency, it would be beneficial to replace all instances of the standard log package with logrus throughout the file. This will provide a uniform logging approach and take full advantage of logrus's features.
Here's a suggestion to replace the remaining log usages with logrus:
- log.Println("Starting server on :8080")
+ logrus.Info("Starting server on :8080")
- log.Println("Error sending to webhook:", err.Error())
+ logrus.Error("Error sending to webhook:", err)Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0 | ||
| github.com/koupleless/arkctl v0.2.2-0.20240702132710-aba4f6ced448 | ||
| github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet v0.2.2 | ||
| github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet v0.3.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Unnecessary dependency on k8s.io/utils detected.
The k8s.io/utils module is listed in both go.mod and go.sum but does not appear to be required by any other dependencies. Consider removing it to simplify the dependency management.
- Remove
k8s.io/utils v0.0.0-20240711033017-18e509b52bc8fromgo.mod
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify compatibility with the updated virtual-kubelet version.
The github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet dependency has been updated from v0.2.2 to v0.3.0. This minor version update might introduce new features or changes that are not backward-compatible.
Please ensure the following:
- Check the changelog for any breaking changes or new features that might affect your code.
- Thoroughly test the application with this new version to ensure compatibility.
- Update any code that might be affected by changes in the new version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the changelog or release notes for the new version
gh repo view github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet --json url -q .url.html_url | xargs -I {} echo "Please check the changelog at: {}/releases/tag/v0.3.0"
Length of output: 279
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Identify direct dependencies that require k8s.io/utils
echo "Direct dependencies that might be using k8s.io/utils:"
# Search for import statements referencing k8s.io/utils in vendor directory
grep -rl 'k8s.io/utils' vendor/ || echo "No dependencies found using k8s.io/utils."
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all modules and identify which ones depend on k8s.io/utils
echo "Modules that depend on k8s.io/utils:"
go list -m all | grep 'k8s.io/utils' || echo "No modules depend on k8s.io/utils."
Length of output: 268
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for k8s.io/utils in go.mod and go.sum
echo "Searching for 'k8s.io/utils' in go.mod and go.sum:"
grep 'k8s.io/utils' go.mod go.sum || echo "'k8s.io/utils' not found in go.mod or go.sum."
Length of output: 419
| // send simple all biz data | ||
| arkBizInfos := make(model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData, 0) | ||
|
|
||
| for _, bizInfo := range b.BizInfos { | ||
| arkBizInfos = append(arkBizInfos, []string{ | ||
| bizInfo.BizName, | ||
| bizInfo.BizVersion, | ||
| "3", | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| msg := model.ArkMqttMsg[model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData]{ | ||
| PublishTimestamp: time.Now().UnixMilli(), | ||
| Data: arkBizInfos, | ||
| } | ||
| msgBytes, _ := json.Marshal(msg) | ||
| b.client.Pub(fmt.Sprintf("koupleless_%s/%s/base/simpleBiz", b.Env, b.ID), 1, msgBytes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and clarify the use of magic numbers in the new code segment.
The new code adds functionality to send simplified business information when the state of a business entity is updated. While this is a valuable addition, there are a few areas that could be improved:
-
The hardcoded "3" on line 285 is not explained. Consider using a named constant or adding a comment to clarify its purpose.
-
There's no error handling for the JSON marshaling operation on line 293. Although it's unlikely to fail, it's good practice to handle potential errors.
-
This new functionality is executed regardless of the
stateparameter. Consider if it's necessary to send this information for all state changes or only for specific states.
Here's a suggested improvement:
+const (
+ unknownField = "3" // TODO: Clarify the purpose of this field
+)
func (b *MockBase) SetBizState(bizIdentity, state, reason, message string) {
// ... (existing code)
- // send simple all biz data
+ // Send simplified business data when state changes to ACTIVATED
+ if state == "ACTIVATED" {
arkBizInfos := make(model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData, 0)
for _, bizInfo := range b.BizInfos {
arkBizInfos = append(arkBizInfos, []string{
bizInfo.BizName,
bizInfo.BizVersion,
- "3",
+ unknownField,
})
}
msg := model.ArkMqttMsg[model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData]{
PublishTimestamp: time.Now().UnixMilli(),
Data: arkBizInfos,
}
- msgBytes, _ := json.Marshal(msg)
- b.client.Pub(fmt.Sprintf("koupleless_%s/%s/base/simpleBiz", b.Env, b.ID), 1, msgBytes)
+ msgBytes, err := json.Marshal(msg)
+ if err != nil {
+ // TODO: Consider how to handle this error (e.g., logging)
+ return
+ }
+ b.client.Pub(fmt.Sprintf("koupleless_%s/%s/base/simpleBiz", b.Env, b.ID), 1, msgBytes)
+ }
}These changes improve error handling, clarify the use of magic numbers, and limit the execution of this new functionality to when the state changes to "ACTIVATED".
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| "env": env, | ||
| "clientID": clientID, | ||
| "env": env, | ||
| "is_cluster": true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use the 'isCluster' variable in the logging context.
The is_cluster field in the logging context is hardcoded to true. It should use the isCluster variable to accurately reflect the actual cluster configuration.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
ctx = log.WithLogger(ctx, log.G(ctx).WithFields(log.Fields{
"clientID": clientID,
"env": env,
- "is_cluster": true,
+ "is_cluster": isCluster,
}))Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| for _, tc := range testCases { | ||
| result := TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos(tc.input) | ||
| if len(result) != 1 { | ||
| t.Errorf("TranslateHeartBeatDataToBaselineQuery(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct Function Name in Error Message
The error message in t.Errorf incorrectly refers to TranslateHeartBeatDataToBaselineQuery. It should be TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos to match the function being tested.
Apply this diff to correct the function name:
-t.Errorf("TranslateHeartBeatDataToBaselineQuery(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)
+t.Errorf("TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| t.Errorf("TranslateHeartBeatDataToBaselineQuery(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | |
| t.Errorf("TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, tc := range testCases { | ||
| result := TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos(tc.input) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update Function Call to Correct Function Name
The function TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos called in the test does not exist. It should be TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos to match the implemented function.
Apply this diff to update the function call:
-result := TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos(tc.input)
+result := TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos(tc.input)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| result := TranslateSimpleBizDataToBizInfos(tc.input) | |
| result := TranslateSimpleBizDataToArkBizInfos(tc.input) |
| result := GetContainerStateFromBizState(tc.input) | ||
| if result != tc.expected { | ||
| t.Errorf("GetContainerStateFromBizState(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | ||
| t.Errorf("GetContainerStateFromSimpleBizState(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct Function Name in Error Message
The function name in the error message GetContainerStateFromSimpleBizState does not match the function being tested GetContainerStateFromBizState. Please update it for consistency.
Apply this diff to correct the function name:
-t.Errorf("GetContainerStateFromSimpleBizState(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)
+t.Errorf("GetContainerStateFromBizState(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| t.Errorf("GetContainerStateFromSimpleBizState(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | |
| t.Errorf("GetContainerStateFromBizState(%s) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) |
| func TestTranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(t *testing.T) { | ||
| testCases := []struct { | ||
| input ark.HealthData | ||
| expected vkModel.NodeStatusData | ||
| }{ | ||
| { | ||
| input: ark.HealthData{ | ||
| Jvm: ark.JvmInfo{ | ||
| JavaMaxMetaspace: 1024, | ||
| JavaCommittedMetaspace: 0, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| expected: vkModel.NodeStatusData{ | ||
| Resources: map[corev1.ResourceName]vkModel.NodeResource{ | ||
| corev1.ResourceMemory: { | ||
| Capacity: resource.MustParse("1Ki"), | ||
| Allocatable: resource.MustParse("1Ki"), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, tc := range testCases { | ||
| result := TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(tc.input) | ||
| if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity { | ||
| t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | ||
| } | ||
| if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable { | ||
| t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure Accurate Comparison of Nested Structures
When comparing complex nested structures in tests, consider using assert.Equal or reflect.DeepEqual to ensure all fields are correctly compared.
Apply this change to enhance the test:
- if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity {
- t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)
- }
- if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable {
- t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)
- }
+ assert.Equal(t, tc.expected, result, "TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) result mismatch", tc.input)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func TestTranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(t *testing.T) { | |
| testCases := []struct { | |
| input ark.HealthData | |
| expected vkModel.NodeStatusData | |
| }{ | |
| { | |
| input: ark.HealthData{ | |
| Jvm: ark.JvmInfo{ | |
| JavaMaxMetaspace: 1024, | |
| JavaCommittedMetaspace: 0, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| expected: vkModel.NodeStatusData{ | |
| Resources: map[corev1.ResourceName]vkModel.NodeResource{ | |
| corev1.ResourceMemory: { | |
| Capacity: resource.MustParse("1Ki"), | |
| Allocatable: resource.MustParse("1Ki"), | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| for _, tc := range testCases { | |
| result := TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(tc.input) | |
| if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity { | |
| t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | |
| } | |
| if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable { | |
| t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| func TestTranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(t *testing.T) { | |
| testCases := []struct { | |
| input ark.HealthData | |
| expected vkModel.NodeStatusData | |
| }{ | |
| { | |
| input: ark.HealthData{ | |
| Jvm: ark.JvmInfo{ | |
| JavaMaxMetaspace: 1024, | |
| JavaCommittedMetaspace: 0, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| expected: vkModel.NodeStatusData{ | |
| Resources: map[corev1.ResourceName]vkModel.NodeResource{ | |
| corev1.ResourceMemory: { | |
| Capacity: resource.MustParse("1Ki"), | |
| Allocatable: resource.MustParse("1Ki"), | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| for _, tc := range testCases { | |
| result := TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(tc.input) | |
| assert.Equal(t, tc.expected, result, "TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) result mismatch", tc.input) | |
| } | |
| } |
| t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | ||
| } | ||
| if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable { | ||
| t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use 'Equal' Method for Comparing 'resource.Quantity'
When comparing resource.Quantity types, use the Equal method instead of the != operator. Direct comparison may not yield accurate results due to the internal representation of resource.Quantity.
Apply this diff to use the Equal method:
-if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity {
+if !result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity.Equal(tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Capacity) {
t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)
}
-if result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable != tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable {
+if !result.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable.Equal(tc.expected.Resources[corev1.ResourceMemory].Allocatable) {
t.Errorf("TranslateHealthDataToNodeStatus(%v) = %v; want %v", tc.input, result, tc.expected)
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.39% 78.09% +0.69%
==========================================
Files 10 10
Lines 1044 1132 +88
==========================================
+ Hits 808 884 +76
- Misses 207 218 +11
- Partials 29 30 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
suite/mock_base.go (1)
215-234: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improvementThe new code segment in the
processUnInstallBizmethod adds proper response handling after uninstalling a biz, which is a good improvement. It provides clear feedback about the operation's success.Consider adding error handling for the JSON marshaling operation:
-respBytes, _ := json.Marshal(resp) +respBytes, err := json.Marshal(resp) +if err != nil { + // Log the error or handle it appropriately + return +}This change would make the code more robust by explicitly handling potential marshaling errors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (9 hunks)
- suite/mock_base.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
suite/mock_base.go (1)
298-318: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove clarity, efficiency, and error handling in the new code segment
The addition of sending simplified business information is a good feature. However, there are several areas where we can improve the code:
- Clarity: The use of magic numbers (3 and 4) for state indices is not clear. Consider using named constants.
- Efficiency: This code runs for every state change, but it might not be necessary to send updates for all state changes.
- Error Handling: There's no error handling for the JSON marshaling operation.
Here's a suggested improvement:
+const ( + stateIndexActivated = "3" + stateIndexOther = "4" +) // send simple all biz data arkBizInfos := make(model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData, 0) for _, bizInfo := range b.BizInfos { - stateIndex := "4" - if state == "ACTIVATED" { - stateIndex = "3" - } + stateIndex := stateIndexOther + if bizInfo.BizState == "ACTIVATED" { + stateIndex = stateIndexActivated + } arkBizInfos = append(arkBizInfos, []string{ bizInfo.BizName, bizInfo.BizVersion, stateIndex, }) } msg := model.ArkMqttMsg[model.ArkSimpleAllBizInfoData]{ PublishTimestamp: time.Now().UnixMilli(), Data: arkBizInfos, } -msgBytes, _ := json.Marshal(msg) +msgBytes, err := json.Marshal(msg) +if err != nil { + // Log the error or handle it appropriately + return +} b.client.Pub(fmt.Sprintf("koupleless_%s/%s/base/simpleBiz", b.Env, b.ID), 1, msgBytes)These changes improve clarity by using named constants, ensure we're using the correct state for each biz (not just the newly changed one), and add error handling for the JSON marshaling operation.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify that the suggested changes have been implemented correctly.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores