Test/e2e subscription tests 3202

[intojhanurag]

fix: #3202

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: intojhanurag
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lkingland for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[knative-prow]

Hi @intojhanurag. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 44.74%. Comparing base (fc761ce) to head (3a887ef).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (fc761ce) and HEAD (3a887ef). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (fc761ce)	HEAD (3a887ef)
integration	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3224      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.80%   44.74%   -7.07%     
==========================================
  Files         162      162              
  Lines       19132    19132              
==========================================
- Hits         9912     8560    -1352     
- Misses       8242     9821    +1579     
+ Partials      978      751     -227     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	?
unit macos-14	44.38% <ø> (ø)
unit macos-latest	44.38% <ø> (ø)
unit ubuntu-24.04-arm	44.57% <ø> (ø)
unit ubuntu-latest	45.32% <ø> (ø)
unit windows-latest	44.40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[intojhanurag]

Hey @gauron99 , Can you give me suggestion to figure out that what i am missing actually my laptop is not able to handle the cluster , So I have not test locally till now .

[gauron99]

Looking at the failed runs it simply shows that, for example, the flag -v is unknown Error: unknown shorthand flag: 'v' in -v

[gauron99]

You should be able to simply open each action and see what has failed (clicking on the "checks" below)

[gauron99]

integration test TestInt_DialInClusterService shows

dialer_int_test.go:184: Get "http://helloworld-ggnc6.default.svc/": failed to exec in pod: command terminated with exit code 1 (stderr: "opening connection\nError: dial tcp :0->10.96.84.46:80: connect: connection refused\nUsage:\n  socat [-u] <address> <address> [flags]\n\nFlags:\n  -d, --debug string   log level (this flag is present only for compatibility and has no effect)\n  -h, --help           help for socat\n  -u, --unidirect      unidirectional mode (left to right)\n\nERROR: dial tcp :0->10.96.84.46:80: connect: connection refused\n")

[intojhanurag]

@gauron99 , Thanks ! make sense.