You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, authors.
This work does inspire me a lot! I have a question about the Frequency domain-based self-attention solver
In this line, it seems that you directly use element-wise multiplication, however in classic attention, Matul (or @) is used.
I can not find any explanation in the paper, so could you give me some insight about this? thanks:D
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
But from the code, when the authors do the element-wise multiplication in this line, they have already come back to the spatial domain because of this line I think. The calculation is not in the frequency domain.
Hi, authors.
This work does inspire me a lot! I have a question about the
Frequency domain-based self-attention solver
In this line, it seems that you directly use element-wise multiplication, however in classic attention, Matul (or @) is used.
I can not find any explanation in the paper, so could you give me some insight about this? thanks:D
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: