Skip to content

change(web): drops hacky approach to focus-based-event unit-tests 📴#7367

Closed
jahorton wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
fix/web/focus-based-unit-tests
Closed

change(web): drops hacky approach to focus-based-event unit-tests 📴#7367
jahorton wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
fix/web/focus-based-unit-tests

Conversation

@jahorton
Copy link
Contributor

@jahorton jahorton commented Sep 28, 2022

I'm spinning this off from #7343, as there's plenty enough just to review within the one file... and, fortunately, the changes are pretty orthogonal. Well, outside of the unit test issue that arises in #7343 when this PR's changes aren't present.

@keymanapp-test-bot skip

@jahorton jahorton added this to the A16S11 milestone Sep 28, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the web/ label Sep 28, 2022
@keymanapp-test-bot keymanapp-test-bot bot added the user-test-missing User tests have not yet been defined for the PR label Sep 28, 2022
@keymanapp-test-bot
Copy link

keymanapp-test-bot bot commented Sep 28, 2022

@keymanapp-test-bot keymanapp-test-bot bot removed the user-test-missing User tests have not yet been defined for the PR label Sep 28, 2022
Base automatically changed from fix/common/web/mock-deadkey-handling to master September 29, 2022 03:37
@jahorton
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm closing this due to a number of small factors:

  • It turned out that the changes were... less orthogonal than I thought.
  • Later changes made to the motivating PR seem to bypass the need for this?
  • Parts of this that actually are orthogonal have been reproduced in chore(web): unit test polishing pass #7381.

@jahorton jahorton closed this Sep 29, 2022
@jahorton jahorton deleted the fix/web/focus-based-unit-tests branch September 29, 2022 03:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant