-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19.7k
Suport keras.op.view() to view the same data bitwise at a new dtype #21763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @wenyi-guo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds support for keras.op.view across multiple backends. The implementation is mostly correct, but there are a few issues to address. The most critical one is an incorrect shape inference logic in the symbolic View operation, which fails to account for shape changes when the data type's item size changes. This could lead to errors in model construction. I've also pointed out that the test suite for this new operation is not comprehensive enough, as it misses this important shape-changing scenario. Finally, there's a minor simplification possible in the NumPy backend implementation. Addressing these points will make the new feature more robust and maintainable.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21763 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.69% 82.63% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 573 577 +4
Lines 58888 59316 +428
Branches 9218 9300 +82
==========================================
+ Hits 48696 49018 +322
- Misses 7845 7910 +65
- Partials 2347 2388 +41
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
hertschuh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR!
A few things for consistency with other ops.
hertschuh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Last nitpick about the unit test.
hertschuh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed a couple small things earlier.
Support view() on backeds numpy, jax, tensorflow, pytorch.