Skip to content

Use ops.add for bias addition in EinsumDense #21299

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DanisNone
Copy link

Replaced the use of the + operator with ops.add(x, bias) when adding the bias term in EinsumDense

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.57%. Comparing base (dfaca0e) to head (6cac2ca).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #21299   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.57%   82.57%           
=======================================
  Files         564      564           
  Lines       54677    54677           
  Branches     8500     8500           
=======================================
  Hits        45152    45152           
  Misses       7435     7435           
  Partials     2090     2090           
Flag Coverage Δ
keras 82.39% <100.00%> (ø)
keras-jax 63.61% <100.00%> (ø)
keras-numpy 58.74% <100.00%> (ø)
keras-openvino 33.04% <0.00%> (ø)
keras-tensorflow 64.02% <100.00%> (ø)
keras-torch 63.68% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants