[DataCatalog]: Save/load catalog obtained from to_config

[ElenaKhaustova]

Description

Implement a method to save and load catalog obtained from KedroDataCatalog.to_config() - #4330, so it could be used when running kedro project with kedro run.

It won't be part of the catalog API, as we should not force any specific saving/loading formats at the catalog level. So, we consider extending the config loader to handle that.

Blocked by #4326 and #4327

Context

#3932

Possible Implementation

Extend OmegaConfigLoader to save and load config obtained from KedroDataCatalog.to_config()

1. Decide on what we do for Inconsistency when setting version via versioned flag and dataset parameter #4326 and Discrepancy between setting save_version via catalog constructor and when passing datasets #4327
   • Deprecate versioned flag and make version part of the dataset config / keep both options / do nothing;
   • Allow/prohibit multiple load versions;
2. Implement separate save for OmegaConfigLoader
3. Extend OmegaConfigLoader.__getitem__ to load files obtained from KedroDataCatalog.to_config(). Currently it outputs four dictionaries: catalog, credetials and load_versions, save_versions. Depending on how we solve step 1 - the output can change.

[Galileo-Galilei]

Do we really need this? This would add extra method and it is unclear to me that we want to specify a specific serialization formation. If we implement DataCatalog.to_config() as a dict[str,str], I guess all standard serialization format would work fine, and we would get rid of all problems due to serialiing a specific python object, because it would essentially become a textual representation of the catalog.

I don't have a preference for the serialization format, because I think it would depend on the use case : mlflow will likely force me to use cloudpickle, but I may want to store it as a plain yaml file in other situations (e.g. to be stored in a config folder to be reused by the kedro CLI), and I it feels very bad to let the catalog offer ways to save in several serialization formats.

[ElenaKhaustova]

Do we really need this? This would add extra method and it is unclear to me that we want to specify a specific serialization formation. If we implement DataCatalog.to_config() as a dict[str,str], I guess all standard serialization format would work fine, and we would get rid of all problems due to serialiing a specific python object, because it would essentially become a textual representation of the catalog.

I don't have a preference for the serialization format, because I think it would depend on the use case : mlflow will likely force me to use cloudpickle, but I may want to store it as a plain yaml file in other situations (e.g. to be stored in a config folder to be reused by the kedro CLI), and I it feels very bad to let the catalog offer ways to save in several serialization formats.

The idea is to be able to save/load serialized config, so one can reuse it when running a pipeline. In other words, make it work when using kedro as a framework with kedro run.

It won't be part of the catalog API as like you mentioned we should not force any specific format or various formats at the catalog level. So we consider extending config loader to handle that.