Skip to content

btrfs-progs: check that device byte values in superblock match those in chunk root #991

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maharmstone
Copy link
Contributor

The superblock of each device contains a copy of the corresponding struct btrfs_dev_item that lives in the chunk root.

Add a check that the total_bytes and bytes_used values of these two copies match.

@adam900710
Copy link
Collaborator

adam900710 commented May 29, 2025

The CI failure is caused by an old image which is created by some older kernel.

I have updated the image with this PR: #992

Which should solve the test failure for fsck/020.

But there are still some more problems need to be solved:

  • fsck/047
    This requires proper repair support, your enhanced check didn't re-read the updated superblock after repair, thus failling that test case.
    This need some updates on your patch.

  • fsck/057
    The check is not handling seed device correctly.
    The sprout fs can modify the old chunks on the seed device, e.g. remove the old empty SYSTEM chunk.
    But since the seed device is completely read-only, the device item can not be updated, thus causing check error.

    The patch should not check a seed device against the sprouted fs.

@maharmstone
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cheers Qu, I'll have a look

intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

 # cd
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
 # mkfs.btrfs test
 # mount test /root/temp

 # cd /root/temp
 # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
 # sync
 # rm *
 # sync
 # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
 # sync

 # cd
 # umount /root/temp
 # btrfs check test

(For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.)

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
@kdave kdave force-pushed the devel branch 6 times, most recently from ef43ce6 to 3eff852 Compare May 30, 2025 14:14
kdave pushed a commit to btrfs/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
adam900710 and others added 16 commits June 6, 2025 08:24
This new option allows end users to specify certain per-inode flags for
specified file/directory inside rootdir.

And mkfs will follow the kernel behavior by inheriting the inode flag
from the parent.

For example:

 rootdir
 |- file1
 |- file2
 |- dir1/
 |  |- file3
 |- subv/     << will be created as a subvolume using --subvol option
    |- dir2/
    |  |- file4
    |- file5

When `mkfs.btrfs --rootdir rootdir --subvol subv --inode-flags
nodatacow:dir1 --inode-flags nodatacow:subv", then the following files
and directory will have *nodatacow* flag set:

- dir1
- file3
- subv
- dir2
- file4
- file5

For now only two flags are supported:

- nodatacow
  Disable data COW, implies *nodatasum* for regular files

- nodatasum
  Disable data checksum only.

This also works with --compress option, and files with nodatasum or
nodatacow flag will skip compression.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The simple test will create a layout like the following:

rootdir
|- file1
|- file2
|- subv/		<< Regular subvolume
|  |- file3
|- nocow_subv/		<< NODATACOW subvolume
|  |- file4
|- nocow_dir/		<< NODATACOW directory
|  |- dir2
|  |  |- file5
|  |- file6
|- nocow_file1		<< NODATACOW file

Any files under NODATACOW subvolume/directory should also be NODATACOW.
The explicitly specified single file should also be NODATACOW.

Issue: kdave#984
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Create a second data block-group to be used for relocation, in case a
zoned filesystem in created.

This second data block-group will then be picked up by the kernel as the
default data relocation block-group on mount.

This ensures we always have a target to relocate good data to when we
need to do garbage collection.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If in btrfs_check_super() we find that the superblock has a csum
mismatch, print the wanted and found values, just as we do for metadata
in __csum_tree_block_size().

When hex-editing a btrfs image, it's useful to use btrfs check to
calculate what the new csum should be. Unfortunately at present this
only works for trees and not for the superblock, meaning you have to use
the much more wordy `btrfs inspect-internal`.

Pull-request: kdave#985
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This feature is provided by commit of kernel fc5c0c58258748 ("btrfs:
defrag: extend ioctl to accept compression levels") which is not
included in 6.14 but 6.15.

[skip ci]

Pull-request: kdave#983
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Block group tree requires no-holes and free-space-tree features, add
such check just like mkfs.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The bytenr sequence of all roots are controlled by our code, so if
something went wrong with the sequence, it's a bug.

A UASSERT() is more suitable for this case.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function requires parameters @slot and @itemoff to record where the
next item should land.

But this is overkilled, as after inserting an item, the temporary extent
buffer will have its header nritems and the item pointer updated.  We
can use that header nritems and item pointer to get where the next item
should land.

This removes the external counter to record @slot and @itemoff.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…_chunk_item()

These functions require parameters @slot and @itemoff to record where the
next item should land.

But this is overkilled, as after inserting an item, the temporary extent
buffer will have its header nritems and the item pointer updated.

We can use that header nritems and item pointer to get where the next
item should land.

This removes the external counter to record @slot and @itemoff.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function requires parameters @slot and @itemoff to record where the
next item should land.

But this is overkilled, as after inserting an item, the temporary extent
buffer will have its header nritems and the item pointer updated.

We can use that header nritems and item pointer to get where the next
item should land.

This removes the external counter to record @slot and @itemoff.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…emp_block_group()

These functions require parameters @slot and @itemoff to record where the
next item should land.

But this is overkilled, as after inserting an item, the temporary extent
buffer will have its header nritems and the item pointer updated.

We can use that header nritems and item pointer to get where the next
item should land.

This removes the external counter to record @slot and @itemoff.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…tree()

Both fs and csum trees are empty at make_convert_btrfs(), no need to use
two different functions to do that.

Merge them into a common setup_temp_empty_tree() instead.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Previously there were some problems related to btrfs-convert bgt support,
that it doesn't work at all, caused by the following reasons:

- We never update the super block with extra compat ro flags
  Even if we set "-O bgt" flags, it will not set the compat ro flags,
  and everything just go non-bgt routine.

  Meanwhile other compat ro flags are for free-space-tree, and
  free-space-tree is rebuilt after the full convert is done.
  Thus this bug won't cause any problem for fst features, but only
  affecting bgt so far.

- No extra handling to create block group tree

Fix above problems by:

- Set the proper compat RO flag for the temporary super block
  We should only set the compat RO flags except the two FST related
  bits.  As FST is handled after conversion, we should not set the flag
  at that timing.

- Add block group tree root item and its backrefs
  So the initial temporary fs will have a proper block group tree.

  The only tricky part is for the extent tree population, where we have
  to put all block group items into the block group tree other than the
  extent tree.

With these two points addressed, now block group tree can be properly
enabled for btrfs-convert.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Previously "btrfs-convert -O bgt" would not cause any error, but the
resulting fs has no block-group-tree feature at all, making it no
different than "btrfs-convert -O ^bgt".

This is a big bug that was never caught by our existing convert runs.
001-ext2-basic and 003-ext4-basic all tested bgt feature, but don't
really check if the resulting fs really have bgt flags set.

To fix that add a new test case, which will do the regular bgt convert,
but at the end also do a super block dump and verify the
BLOCK_GROUP_TREE flag is properly set.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ci skip]

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ci skip]

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…in chunk root

The superblock of each device contains a copy of the corresponding
struct btrfs_dev_item that lives in the chunk root.

Add a check that the total_bytes and bytes_used values of these two
copies match.

Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
@maharmstone maharmstone force-pushed the check-superblock-devitem branch from 0bdf0aa to 1164c01 Compare June 6, 2025 14:19
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Whissi pushed a commit to Whissi/linux-stable that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
github-actions bot pushed a commit to sirdarckcat/linux-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
github-actions bot pushed a commit to sirdarckcat/linux-1 that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gregkh pushed a commit to gregkh/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
opsiff pushed a commit to opsiff/UOS-kernel that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9052c7bca391bac0598c5f31302313539899a218)
opsiff pushed a commit to opsiff/UOS-kernel that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9052c7bca391bac0598c5f31302313539899a218)
opsiff pushed a commit to opsiff/UOS-kernel that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6c59782898d44a02e935f2bf95916f8d9f0c43c0)
opsiff pushed a commit to opsiff/UOS-kernel that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6c59782898d44a02e935f2bf95916f8d9f0c43c0)
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
woodsts pushed a commit to woodsts/linux-stable that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
oraclelinuxkernel pushed a commit to oracle/linux-uek that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6c59782898d44a02e935f2bf95916f8d9f0c43c0)
Signed-off-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@oracle.com>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnny-mnemonic pushed a commit to linux-ia64/linux-stable-rc that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Whissi pushed a commit to Whissi/linux-stable that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
commit ae4477f upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Carlotta-Montelli pushed a commit to Carlotta-Montelli/android_kernel_xiaomi_gauguin that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf7243d62d ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
…in chunk root

The superblock of each device contains a copy of the corresponding
struct btrfs_dev_item that lives in the chunk root.

Add a check that the total_bytes and bytes_used values of these two
copies match.

Pull-request: #991
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
…in chunk root

The superblock of each device contains a copy of the corresponding
struct btrfs_dev_item that lives in the chunk root.

Add a check that the total_bytes and bytes_used values of these two
copies match.

Pull-request: #991
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
taraant pushed a commit to wirenboard/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
hargar19 pushed a commit to microsoft/OHCL-Linux-Kernel that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
commit ae4477f937569d097ca5dbce92a89ba384b49bc6 upstream.

Each superblock contains a copy of the device item for that device. In a
transaction which drops a chunk but doesn't create any new ones, we were
correctly updating the device item in the chunk tree but not copying
over the new bytes_used value to the superblock.

This can be seen by doing the following:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4096 count=2621440
  # mkfs.btrfs test
  # mount test /root/temp

  # cd /root/temp
  # for i in {00..10}; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=4096 count=32768; done
  # sync
  # rm *
  # sync
  # btrfs balance start -dusage=0 .
  # sync

  # cd
  # umount /root/temp
  # btrfs check test

For btrfs-check to detect this, you will also need my patch at
kdave/btrfs-progs#991.

Change btrfs_remove_dev_extents() so that it adds the devices to the
fs_info->post_commit_list if they're not there already. This causes
btrfs_commit_device_sizes() to be called, which updates the bytes_used
value in the superblock.

Fixes: bbbf724 ("btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
@adam900710
Copy link
Collaborator

Considering it's still causing problems in the CI systems (the kernel is not having the backport), I'll change the check to do a warning other than an error instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants