Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geojson crs is staying after all #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2014
Merged

Conversation

sheppard
Copy link
Contributor

@sheppard sheppard commented Jan 8, 2014

I propose removing the caveat about GeoJSON CRS, as it looks like the GeoJSON WG has determined that removing the CRS definition from the standard entirely would cause more problems than it would solve. So, L.Proj.GeoJSON will continue be an implementation of a standard (though not recommended) GeoJSON feature - the ability to use coordinate systems other than CRS84.

See geojson/draft-geojson#14 and https://gist.github.com/sgillies/8304592.

cc @mourner

@sheppard
Copy link
Contributor Author

sheppard commented Jan 8, 2014

Hmm, perhaps we should still have an explicit reminder to users that CRS84 should still be used in most cases (to better reflect the spirit of the standard).

perliedman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2014
geojson crs is staying after all
@perliedman perliedman merged commit 0c71274 into kartena:master Jan 15, 2014
@perliedman
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

Although I really prefer WGS84, I think they made a good choice here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants