CI: PR1 - Create reusable workflow (BLOCKER PR)#57
Open
vbhavh wants to merge 2 commits intokagenti:mainfrom
Open
CI: PR1 - Create reusable workflow (BLOCKER PR)#57vbhavh wants to merge 2 commits intokagenti:mainfrom
vbhavh wants to merge 2 commits intokagenti:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Singh <95634443+vbhavh@users.noreply.github.com>
rubambiza
requested changes
Apr 6, 2026
Contributor
rubambiza
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarifying comment about the access tokens and action version pinning.
Author
|
@rubambiza Could an org admin please: Create a fine-grained PAT scoped to the kagenti org Once that is set up, the workflow will work as expected. |
Contributor
|
@vbhavh Good progress so far, thanks! Some feedback/status below:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Created a reusable workflow
Key points:
Related issue(s)
kagenti/kagenti#870