-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix version parsing #739
Fix version parsing #739
Conversation
nbdime/_version.py
Outdated
version_info = VersionInfo( | ||
int(groups["major"]), | ||
int(groups["minor"]), | ||
int(groups["micro"]), | ||
_specifier_[groups.get("releaselevel", "")], | ||
_specifier_.get(groups.get("releaselevel", ""), "final"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if this is the right choice: if someone makes a mistake and bumps to "beta" instead of "b", then it will default to final since it cannot parse it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you mind sharing what error you were seeing that this will fix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
_specifier_.get(groups.get("releaselevel", ""), "final"), | |
_specifier_[groups.get("releaselevel") or ""], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error is that if not found groups.get("releaselevel") is None
. Therefore, as None
is not a key of _specificer
, it raises an KeyError
.
I'll go for a more advance solution than Vidar's proposal as the proposed solution does not address the case of release level being beta
for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My point was that "beta" would be an invalid value that should throw an error. Somewhere at least.. probably not good for it to throw in packaged code though, so this change is fine. But yes, let's try to get a regression test for the future as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For documentation, beta
is a valid specifier: https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/#pre-release-spelling
Merging and releasing a patch version |
Follow-up of 4.0.0 release
Xref #659 (comment)