Init ClientService #16
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@NickCao has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe changes update the configuration and API definitions. In Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ClientService
participant Storage
Client->>ClientService: Request (e.g., GetExporter)
ClientService->>Storage: Retrieve/Modify Exporter Data
Storage-->>ClientService: Data/Confirmation
ClientService-->>Client: Response
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
buf.yaml (1)
12-13: Consider documenting the rationale for lint exceptions.While these exceptions may be necessary for your API design, it would be helpful to document why these specific lint rules are being disabled:
RPC_RESPONSE_STANDARD_NAMERPC_REQUEST_RESPONSE_UNIQUEproto/jumpstarter/v1/jumpstarter.proto (1)
66-74: Consider adding filter field for more flexible querying.The
ListExportersRequesthas aselectorfield for label-based filtering, but consider adding afilterfield for more complex query capabilities.message ListExportersRequest { string parent = 1 [ (google.api.field_behavior) = REQUIRED, (google.api.resource_reference) = {child_type: "jumpstarter.dev/Exporter"} ]; int32 page_size = 2; string page_token = 3; LabelSelector selector = 4; + string filter = 5; // For complex filtering beyond labels }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
buf.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
buf.yaml(1 hunks)proto/jumpstarter/v1/jumpstarter.proto(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
buf.yaml (1)
4-5: LGTM! Required dependency for Google API annotations.The addition of
buf.build/googleapis/googleapisdependency is necessary for the new ClientService implementation which uses Google API annotations for HTTP endpoints.proto/jumpstarter/v1/jumpstarter.proto (2)
18-45: LGTM! Well-structured REST API design.The ClientService implementation follows REST best practices:
- Proper HTTP verb mapping (GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE)
- Resource-oriented URLs
- Clear method signatures
47-57: LGTM! Well-defined resource pattern.The Exporter resource is well-defined with:
- Clear resource pattern
- Proper singular/plural forms
- Required identifier field
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores