Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2026. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@NickCao
Copy link
Collaborator

@NickCao NickCao commented Jan 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Build Process

    • Updated Docker image build and push workflow to use docker-buildx
    • Transitioned from ko tool to native Docker build methods
    • Added support for cross-platform image builds
  • Documentation

    • Updated deployment instructions in README to reflect new Docker build command
  • Infrastructure

    • Modified GitHub Actions workflow to use new Docker build process
    • Updated Makefile to support flexible container tooling

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a transition from using ko to a more flexible Docker-based build system. The changes affect multiple files, including the GitHub Actions workflow, Dockerfile, Makefile, README.md, and end-to-end test configuration. The primary focus is on modifying the Docker image build and push processes, replacing ko-push and ko-build commands with new docker-push and docker-build targets that support cross-platform builds and provide more flexibility in container tooling.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yaml Replaced make ko-push with make docker-buildx in Docker image build step
Dockerfile New multi-stage build process using Red Hat UBI images, supporting architecture-specific builds
Makefile Replaced ko-related variables and targets with Docker-centric commands, added docker-buildx for multi-arch support
README.md Updated deployment instructions from make ko-push to make docker-push
test/e2e/e2e_test.go Changed image build command from make ko-build to make docker-build

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix e2e test #78: Changes in Makefile related to Docker image building and pushing processes

Suggested reviewers

  • mangelajo

Poem

🐰 Dockerfiles dance, build commands prance,
From ko to docker, a build romance!
Multi-arch magic, containers so bright,
Our code takes flight with build delight! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NickCao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NickCao commented Jan 27, 2025

Motivation: move us closer to the default kubebuilder scaffold, this would make future upgrades easier.

@mangelajo mangelajo changed the base branch from e2e-fix to main January 28, 2025 09:21
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Makefile (1)

Remove unused ko-related variable

The KO_VERSION variable on line 250 is no longer used and can be safely removed to maintain a clean configuration.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-250: Verify complete removal of ko-related configurations

Let's ensure all ko-related configurations have been properly removed or migrated.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining ko-related configurations
echo "Searching for remaining ko-related configurations..."
rg -i 'ko[_-]' --type make

Length of output: 174

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Makefile (2)

101-110: LGTM! Clean Docker build and push targets

The targets are well-documented and properly use the CONTAINER_TOOL variable for flexibility.

Consider adding a check for required environment variables:

 .PHONY: docker-push
 docker-push: ## Push docker image with the manager.
+	@if [ -z "${IMG}" ]; then echo "IMG is not set"; exit 1; fi
 	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) push ${IMG}

112-130: Enhance error handling in docker-buildx target

The cross-platform build support is well-implemented, but could benefit from improved error handling.

Consider these improvements:

 .PHONY: docker-buildx
 docker-buildx: ## Build and push docker image for the manager for cross-platform support
+	@if ! $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx version > /dev/null 2>&1; then \
+		echo "buildx not available. Please enable docker buildx."; \
+		exit 1; \
+	fi
 	# copy existing Dockerfile and insert --platform=${BUILDPLATFORM} into Dockerfile.cross, and preserve the original Dockerfile
 	sed -e '1 s/\(^FROM\)/FROM --platform=\$$\{BUILDPLATFORM\}/; t' -e ' 1,// s//FROM --platform=\$$\{BUILDPLATFORM\}/' Dockerfile > Dockerfile.cross
-	- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx create --name jumpstarter-controller-builder
+	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx create --name jumpstarter-controller-builder 2>/dev/null || true
 	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx use jumpstarter-controller-builder
-	- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx build --push --platform=$(PLATFORMS) \
+	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx build --push --platform=$(PLATFORMS) \
 			--tag ${DOCKER_REPO}:${DOCKER_TAG} \
 			--tag ${DOCKER_REPO}:latest \
 			-f Dockerfile.cross .
-	- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx rm jumpstarter-controller-builder
-	rm Dockerfile.cross
+	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx rm jumpstarter-controller-builder 2>/dev/null || true
+	rm -f Dockerfile.cross
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e999a5 and 7bf2ea1.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (4 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • test/e2e/e2e_test.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: deploy-kind
  • GitHub Check: lint-go
  • GitHub Check: e2e-tests
  • GitHub Check: tests
🔇 Additional comments (9)
test/e2e/e2e_test.go (1)

66-66: LGTM! Command updated to use docker-build.

The change aligns with the transition from ko to docker-based build system.

Dockerfile (4)

2-2: LGTM! Using UBI go-toolset with fixed version.

Using registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/go-toolset:1.22.9 aligns with the previous discussion about using a version that's available downstream.


7-11: LGTM! Proper layer caching implementation.

Good practice to copy and download dependencies before source code to leverage Docker layer caching.


19-23: LGTM! Cross-platform build support.

Good documentation explaining the GOARCH handling for cross-platform builds. The empty default allows the binary to match the build platform.


25-28: Consider workspace permissions in builder stage.

Based on previous review comments, there might be permission issues when building on UBI due to workspace ownership.

Run this script to check workspace permissions in the builder image:

.github/workflows/build.yaml (1)

42-42: LGTM! Using docker-buildx for cross-platform builds.

The change to docker-buildx enables multi-architecture image builds, which is necessary for releasing to quay.io. As discussed in previous comments, while docker-build works with podman for single architecture, docker-buildx is preferred for releases.

README.md (1)

18-18: LGTM! Documentation updated for docker-push.

The README correctly reflects the transition from ko to docker-based build system.

Makefile (2)

5-6: LGTM! Well-structured variable declarations

The variable declarations are clean and follow best practices:

  • Proper extraction of repository and tag from IMG variable
  • Well-documented CONTAINER_TOOL variable with flexibility for alternative tools like podman

Also applies to: 17-21


153-153: LGTM! Correct dependency update

The deploy target correctly depends on docker-build, aligning with the transition from ko to Docker.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Makefile (1)

101-111: Enhance target documentation and declarations.

While the implementation is correct, consider:

  1. Adding more descriptive comments about expected outcomes and prerequisites
  2. Moving the .PHONY declarations to be closer to their targets for better maintainability
 # If you wish to build the manager image targeting other platforms you can use the --platform flag.
 # (i.e. docker build --platform linux/arm64). However, you must enable docker buildKit for it.
 # More info: https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/build_enhancements/
+# Prerequisites:
+# - Docker or alternative container tool configured in CONTAINER_TOOL
+# - Proper permissions to build containers
 .PHONY: docker-build
 docker-build: ## Build docker image with the manager.
 	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) build -t ${IMG} .

+# Prerequisites:
+# - Completed docker-build
+# - Authentication configured for the target registry
 .PHONY: docker-push
 docker-push: ## Push docker image with the manager.
 	$(CONTAINER_TOOL) push ${IMG}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bf2ea1 and 3ce22ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (4 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • test/e2e/e2e_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml
  • test/e2e/e2e_test.go
  • README.md
  • Dockerfile
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: deploy-kind
  • GitHub Check: e2e-tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Makefile (4)

5-6: LGTM! Clean variable extraction from IMG.

The shell commands correctly split the IMG variable into repository and tag components.


17-22: LGTM! Good practice allowing container tool flexibility.

The CONTAINER_TOOL variable with clear documentation enables future flexibility while maintaining Docker as the well-tested default.


153-153: LGTM! Proper dependency chain for deployment.

The deploy target correctly depends on docker-build, cluster, and grpcurl, maintaining a proper build and deployment sequence.


112-130: Verify buildx setup and enhance Dockerfile modification.

The multi-platform build implementation is solid, but consider:

  1. The sed command for Dockerfile modification might be fragile if the Dockerfile format changes
  2. The buildx builder might conflict with existing instances

Run this script to verify the buildx setup and Dockerfile modification:

✅ Verification successful

The multi-platform build implementation is correct and robust

The current implementation:

  • Correctly modifies only the builder stage's FROM instruction
  • Properly handles multi-stage builds
  • Uses appropriate platform-specific arguments
  • Includes proper cleanup of temporary files and builder instances
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify buildx prerequisites and Dockerfile compatibility

# Check if buildx is available
docker buildx version || echo "buildx not available"

# Verify that the Dockerfile modification works as expected
if [ -f Dockerfile ]; then
  # Test the sed command
  sed -e '1 s/\(^FROM\)/FROM --platform=\${BUILDPLATFORM\}/; t' -e ' 1,// s//FROM --platform=\${BUILDPLATFORM\}/' Dockerfile > test.dockerfile
  # Check if the modification was successful
  grep -q 'FROM --platform=${BUILDPLATFORM}' test.dockerfile || echo "Dockerfile modification failed"
  rm test.dockerfile
else
  echo "Dockerfile not found"
fi

# Check for existing builder instances
docker buildx ls | grep jumpstarter-controller-builder && echo "Warning: builder instance already exists"

Length of output: 557


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify Dockerfile structure and modification logic

# Check Dockerfile existence and content
if [ -f Dockerfile ]; then
    echo "=== Original Dockerfile first line ==="
    head -n 1 Dockerfile

    echo -e "\n=== Testing sed command ==="
    # Test the sed modification
    sed -e '1 s/\(^FROM\)/FROM --platform=\${BUILDPLATFORM\}/; t' -e ' 1,// s//FROM --platform=\${BUILDPLATFORM\}/' Dockerfile > test.dockerfile
    head -n 1 test.dockerfile
    rm test.dockerfile

    echo -e "\n=== Checking for existing builder instances ==="
    # Search for existing builder configuration in common locations
    find . -type f -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" | xargs grep -l "jumpstarter-controller-builder" || echo "No existing builder configurations found"
else
    echo "Dockerfile not found in repository root"
    # Try to locate Dockerfile in subdirectories
    find . -name "Dockerfile" -type f
fi

Length of output: 730


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Analyze Dockerfile structure and FROM instructions

echo "=== Dockerfile Content ==="
cat Dockerfile

echo -e "\n=== Locating FROM instructions ==="
grep -n "^FROM" Dockerfile || echo "No FROM instructions found"

echo -e "\n=== Testing modified sed command ==="
# Modified sed to target first FROM instruction
sed '/^FROM/ {s/\(^FROM\)/FROM --platform=\${BUILDPLATFORM\}/;:a;n;ba}' Dockerfile > test.dockerfile
echo "=== Modified Dockerfile first FROM instruction ==="
grep -n "^FROM" test.dockerfile
rm test.dockerfile

Length of output: 1952

COPY go.sum go.sum
# cache deps before building and copying source so that we don't need to re-download as much
# and so that source changes don't invalidate our downloaded layer
RUN go mod download
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great idea

Copy link
Member

@mangelajo mangelajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, looks great!

@mangelajo mangelajo merged commit 18e3315 into main Feb 4, 2025
6 checks passed
@NickCao NickCao deleted the docker-build branch February 28, 2025 14:15
@mangelajo mangelajo added this to the 0.6.0 milestone May 8, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants