Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed: Fixed PT-BR language adaptation issue #4641

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Fixed: PT-BR languange adaptation issue
Fixed: Fixed PT-BR language adaptation issue

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team February 13, 2025 08:26
@@ -131,7 +141,7 @@ export default {
prop: 'actions',
label: i18n.t('Actions'),
align: 'center',
width: '100px',
width: this.dynamicActionWidth,
formatter: ActionsFormatter,
fixed: 'right',
formatterArgs: {}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The above code seems to be an array of options defined using Vue.js and Vuex, including computed properties (dynamicActionWidth), computed methods like config, watchers on object updates (watch) among other attributes. As per the requirement, it's important to ensure there is no issue with naming conflicts or missing functionality.

Potential Improvements:

Ensure that all components use correct template strings in component names and values without typos so they function correctly across various locales.

Optimize the watcher handlers based on performance improvements (e.g. debounce when checking actions changes). Debounce might increase performance if you have a lot of listeners reacting similarly over short intervals.

Make sure all computed properties follow the same formatting styles in all translations to maintain consistency.

For further optimizations or adjustments please specify more details regarding which specific parts are causing concern and how they could potentially be improved.

width: this.$i18n.locale === 'pt-br' ? '120px' : '100px'
}
}
hasImport: true
},
treeSetting: {
showMenu: false,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There seems to be an intentional typo in the code snippet above. The line that was supposed to say "@@ is there" instead says "export * from './accounts.module';", which changes it to use ES6 modules instead of CommonJS or Node.js syntax, allowing it to import and export custom components from another module file.

In general:

  • Use correct indentation according to JavaScript standards.

  • Ensure all variables and strings end with periods (.) after each word like hasLeftActions = true.

    • This also applies to variable names (importFrom), making them look more human-friendly than overly cryptic identifiers.
    • For example, replace @@ @ at top with a clear comment describing what follows: [This indicates]
  • Correctly wrap single-letter function or property definitions (such as console.log) correctly around parenthesis if needed.

Suggestions for improvement include ensuring consistency in style (using consistent spacing) and clarity rather than trying to make comments very cryptic (they can become confusing). Proper imports and exports should always align with the conventions described here.

For this specific case:

  • Remove unnecessary blank lines before closing { on the same line as opening block (to maintain readability).
  • Add missing quotes in object keys when necessary.

Please note that any actual coding errors would not show up here since these checks require access to the files they're referencing. Please double-check against the files used by your project for exact formatting matches and ensure no typos remain.

@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ export default {
label: this.$t('ApproverNumbers')
},
actions: {
width: (this.$i18n.locale === 'pt-br' || this.$i18n.locale === 'en') ? '120px' : '100px',
formatterArgs: {
hasClone: false,
updateRoute: ({ row }) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code seems to be incomplete, with a function export default { ... } at line 31 and missing lines below line 40. Without knowing the full context of these blocks, it's difficult to make specific suggestions about potential issues or optimizations.

To get more help from me, please provide the complete code or relevant parts of the codebase you would like my evaluation on.

@ZhaoJiSen ZhaoJiSen merged commit f2e6f89 into dev Feb 13, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@ZhaoJiSen ZhaoJiSen deleted the pr@dev@fixed_account_execution branch February 13, 2025 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants