Skip to content

Conversation

@nordicjm
Copy link

Adds test code for new net_mgmt events relating to adding and
removing DNS servers

Signed-off-by: Jamie McCrae jamie.mccrae@lairdtech.com

Adds test code for new net_mgmt events relating to adding and
removing DNS servers

Signed-off-by: Jamie McCrae <jamie.mccrae@lairdtech.com>
@nordicjm nordicjm requested a review from jukkar as a code owner June 26, 2019 08:32
@nordicjm
Copy link
Author

$ ./scripts/sanitycheck -p native_posix -s tests/net/lib/dns_addremove/net.dns.no_ipv6
JOBS: 8
Cleaning output directory /tmp/zephyr/sanity-out
Building testcase defconfigs...
Filtering test cases...
1 tests selected, 112979 tests discarded due to filters
total complete: 1/ 1 100% failed: 0
1 of 1 tests passed with 0 warnings in 15 seconds
$ ./scripts/sanitycheck -p native_posix -s tests/net/lib/dns_addremove/net.dns
JOBS: 8
Cleaning output directory /tmp/zephyr/sanity-out
Building testcase defconfigs...
Filtering test cases...
1 tests selected, 112979 tests discarded due to filters
total complete: 1/ 1 100% failed: 0
1 of 1 tests passed with 0 warnings in 16 seconds

@jukkar jukkar merged this pull request into jukkar:bug-16924-dns-net-mgmt-event Jun 27, 2019
jukkar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2020
This makes the gatt metrics also available for
gatt write-without-rsp-cb so it now prints the rate of each write:

uart:~$ gatt write-without-response-cb 1e ff 10 10
Write #1: 16 bytes (0 bps)
Write #2: 32 bytes (3445948416 bps)
Write #3: 48 bytes (2596929536 bps)
Write #4: 64 bytes (6400 bps)
Write #5: 80 bytes (8533 bps)
Write #6: 96 bytes (10666 bps)
Write #7: 112 bytes (8533 bps)
Write #8: 128 bytes (9955 bps)
Write #9: 144 bytes (11377 bps)
Write #10: 160 bytes (7680 bps)
Write #11: 176 bytes (8533 bps)
Write #12: 192 bytes (9386 bps)
Write Complete (err 0)
Write #13: 208 bytes (8533 bps)
Write #14: 224 bytes (9244 bps)
Write #15: 240 bytes (9955 bps)
Write #16: 256 bytes (8000 bps)

Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants