Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple projects per position #65

Closed
redbeard opened this issue Jul 8, 2014 · 12 comments
Closed

Multiple projects per position #65

redbeard opened this issue Jul 8, 2014 · 12 comments

Comments

@redbeard
Copy link

redbeard commented Jul 8, 2014

The idea is to allow per-project details at the same company. Similar to the new(ish) feature in LinkedIn profiles.

Structure follows same fields as position schema, but without company name, website, etc.

{
  "work": [{
    ...
    "projects": [{
        "startDate": "string", // resume.json uses the ISO 8601 date standard e.g. 2014-06-29
        "endDate": "string", // e.g. 2012-06-29
        "summary": "string", // Give an overview of your responsibilities in the project
        "highlights": [] // As in position schema
      }]
    }]
}
@ocram
Copy link
Contributor

ocram commented Jul 9, 2014

I think this blows up not only the specification but also your resulting CV.

@redbeard
Copy link
Author

redbeard commented Jul 9, 2014

I disagree, evidenced by the use of it on LinkedIn.

It is extremely helpful for consultants who often have multiple
long-term assignments with clients of the same employer.

-T

On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Marco notifications@github.com wrote:

I think this blows up not only the specification but also your resulting
CV.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#65 (comment)
.

@DonDebonair
Copy link
Member

I agree this is needed.

Also, as @rolandnsharp mentioned in #24 it sometimes makes sense to specify who you worked for, in addition to who employed you. This is not only needed in the context of contracter work, but also when you work for multiple clients and want to specify those.

My suggestion is two kill two birds with one stone and introduce "projects" for each "work" entry. Not only can you specify for each project for/at which client you did that project, you can also specify - beyond what separate "highlights" offers - what the project consisted of.

@lannybroo
Copy link

Similar but related request: I'd like to organize my resume by multiple roles I've held at my organization. With the current schema, I've had to list the same employer multiple times to accomplish this, but I'd rather have another layer of hierarchy under each employer.

@mchelen
Copy link
Member

mchelen commented Nov 6, 2014

I'd like this feature as a way to show multiple consulting clients without using separate Work entries.

@nikolay
Copy link

nikolay commented Dec 18, 2014

👍 This is needed, plus, it's should be optional, it's backward-compatible, and not all themes have to implement it.

@DonDebonair
Copy link
Member

Can @thomasdavis and @opensourcegrrrl weigh in on this?

@osg
Copy link

osg commented Jan 8, 2015

+1

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Sep 10, 2015

There is a definite need for this as was already mentioned consultancy clients or fast moving companies use their employees for more than one project. One could use highlights, but that is not the perfect place and not as accurate and clean.

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Sep 10, 2015

Definitely could be combined with #11

@olivif
Copy link
Collaborator

olivif commented Feb 21, 2016

Moving over the discussion to the new issue. I believe all topics covered here are included in the proposition.

@olivif olivif closed this as completed Feb 21, 2016
@nikolay
Copy link

nikolay commented Nov 16, 2016

@olivif I don't think you understand the exact idea behind this issue! While working for an agency, which is one employment, I could be working for different clients on different projects and being on different positions on each project. Also, even on a single job, I could have multiple titles (if you gets promoted/demoted, etc.)

Okay, these are edge cases, but if the schema does not allow you to handle 10-20% of the cases, then it's not universal, and many people will fork the tools, and themes to get around this, which is sad.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants