Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publications #307

Open
jessequinn opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

Publications #307

jessequinn opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@jessequinn
Copy link

jessequinn commented Jun 5, 2018

Would it be possible to add an object in publications that allows for more details?

Currently the resume-schema for publications is:

"publications": [{
"name": "Publication",
"publisher": "Company",
"releaseDate": "2014-10-01",
"website": "http://publication.com",
"summary": "Description..."
}],

However, and object that contains details such as volume, pages, issue would be very useful for those in academia. In additions, an array for authors would be greatly appreciated as well. Any information on this matter would be appreciated.

@niyumard
Copy link

niyumard commented Sep 5, 2018

And not all people are the authors of the publications.
Some in Academia might have translated a paper, edited or revised.

@wayneamurphy
Copy link

Just a question: if a person has not written but "just" translated or edited a paper - then why would they list it as a publication of theirs? Wouldn't that be either a work (or volunteer) accomplishment, or even a project?

@jessequinn
Copy link
Author

or add a field that includes options such as author editor etc

@stp-ip
Copy link
Member

stp-ip commented Dec 12, 2019

Within Resumic we are thinking about having a Roles array to showcase your specific involvement, if it isn't just being an author and a coAuthor array to acknowledge them. Anything else seems too detailed to showcase in your own resume.

@heitorPB
Copy link

heitorPB commented Sep 4, 2020

I'd like to suggest to also add a DOI field.

@thomasdavis
Copy link
Member

This might be one of my least favorite calls on v1, publications deserve there own field.

BUT.

All fields we define have to be implemented by theme developers. It is hard to tell if the main theme developers even need this distinction.

BUT.

Publications are quite different to certifications, will leave this issue open for a few days.

And also elevated to "High Priority"

@bilalshaikh42
Copy link

I'd like to suggest to also add a DOI field.

Saw this after opening pr #405. This is essential for many publications

@Altair-Bueno
Copy link

Basically the current publications field is unusable on academia.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants