🧹 [code health improvement] Refactor relationship checks to use RelationshipContext - #54
Conversation
Co-authored-by: joy7758 <138868899+joy7758@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: Refactored the
_check_*functions insaee_backend/services/evidence_adequacy.pyto accept a singleRelationshipContextdataclass instead of five individual parameters.💡 Why: This improves maintainability and readability by bundling the many arguments passed to the relationship checker functions into a single context object, reducing code duplication and signature length.
✅ Verification: Full test suite passes and verified structure of functions in code.
✨ Result: Cleaned up signatures for six internal functions and their dispatcher, making it easier to add new arguments to the context in the future if needed.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 2175375804956005485 started by @joy7758