RDF4J conversion

[ansell]

General issue for the conversion to RDF4J.

Other than the technical changes that should be fairly straightforward, should we change the name to something not including the word "sesame" anymore.

[joshsh]

Good question. RDFTools4J? If we can find a good name, then yes. Otherwise, I don't think there is much harm in letting the name decouple.

[ansell]

Keeping the status quo and decoupling may be useful to keep the brand in the long term, but may cause confusion in the near future. I don't have any immediate good names to propose though so maybe just staying with the current name would be the best way to go.

[abrokenjester]

Just freewheeling here (and also going slightly off topic), but have you considered a possible merge with the RDF4J project? We'd be overjoyed to have you on board.

Not something to decide on overnight of course and I'll understand if you prefer to keep the project under your own control. But I can't help thinking that having our committers cooperate more will benefit everyone.

Btw apologies if I asked this before and you already said no. I honestly can't remember :)