Skip to content

A quick study on the impact of irreducible-background subtraction

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

jonbutterworth/leshouches_bkgsub

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

59 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

A quick study on the impact of irreducible-background subtraction

Project started at Les Houches 2015 by Jon Butterworth, Paolo Francavilla, Frank Krauss, Carlo Pandini, Luca Parrozzi, …

Wiki page: http://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/2015:groups:tools:backgrounds

Processes to consider:

WW versus ttbar

14 TeV (maybe also 13 TeV), B-tag up to y=2.5 (allowing a veto on b-jets in this region if it helps). Also look at the impact of pseudo-top vetos.

Double leptonic channel:

  1. Consider WWjj as the signal. Look at WW scattering-like WWjj topologies. Study the contribution to the signal coming from double-resonant (DR), single-resonant (SR) and continuum (C) ttbar processes, and the sum.

  2. Consider WWj or WW as the signal. Look at jet-binning for for all WW (not just the VBS topology). Same study (DR/SR/C/Sum)

  3. Consider WWbb as the signal, motivated by WWH (H→bb). Same study (DR/SR/C/Sum).

Semi-leptonic channel:

  1. Consider ttbar as signal. Look at distortion in b-lepton mass from SR/C/Sum/WWbb-non-top contributions.

Wb versus t

Link to the ATLAS paper TBD

This would be a nice demo of some of the ideas above with a real measurement. Treat Wb excluding t as the signal, use the ATLAS Wb (unsubstracted) measurement and re-evaluate the single-top subtraction and systematics.

About

A quick study on the impact of irreducible-background subtraction

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • TeX 65.1%
  • C++ 30.7%
  • Gnuplot 4.2%