Turn off message in new buffer

[brotzeit]

Every time I open a new file in a project with eglot running I get this message. Is there an option to disable it ?

`[eglot]` Automatically started `rustfmt' to manage `rustic-mode' buffers in project `rustfmt'

[joaotavora]

There are two problems here:

• First the message has a bug. It should state the server name, and not the project nickname in the first space.
• Also, you seem to have eglot-ensure in your rustic-mode-hook That's fine (as long as you have it only in that hook and nowhere else, so please confirm this bit). However, that particular message shouldn't be displayed if you open a file in the same project. This is the message that should be displayed:

<buffer-name> is already managed by existing `rustfmt'

So now two more points:

1. Are you sure that isn't the message that you're seeing repeatedly and would like to hide?
2. If you answered yes to 1 and you are seeing the "Automatically started..." thing, then we have a more serious bug. To analyse that, I need you to try to reproduce the problem with a minimal emacs+eglot+rustic configuration and post the detailed steps here, without omitting anything.

[brotzeit]

1. I copied the message from the log
2. I just open emacs with the config below and open a file in a git repo.

Complete config:

(setq package-archives '(("melpa" . "http://melpa.org/packages/")))

(require 'package)
(package-initialize)

(unless (package-installed-p 'use-package)
  (package-refresh-contents)
  (package-install 'use-package))

(use-package rustic :ensure t :pin melpa)
(use-package eglot :ensure t :pin melpa)
(setq rustic-rls-pkg 'eglot)

I realized that rustfmt is the project name. I've tried this in the rls git repo and now the message contains rls.

But in the rls repo I also get an error:
[eglot] Server reports (type=1): Cargo failed: Error compiling dependent crate[eglot] Server reports (type=1): Cargo failed: Error compiling dependent crate

[joaotavora]

@brotzeit,

Thanks. So I tried your config and didn't spot the second more serious problem, which is good. Everything works as intended.

When I open a file on a previously untouched Rust project, I first get the message

[eglot] Automatically started `EGLOT (guessing_game/rustic-mode)' to manage `rustic-mode' buffers in project `guessing_game'

The, after each new opened file in that project I get the second message

[eglot] Buffer is already managed by existing `guessing_game'
[eglot] Buffer is already managed by existing `guessing_game'
[eglot] Buffer is already managed by existing `guessing_game'
[eglot] Buffer is already managed by existing `guessing_game'
...

I asked you this before: it is the second repeating message that you want to get rid of. Not the first, right?

PS: the RLS problem doesn't seem to have anything to do with Eglot, which is just forwarding you the error message.

[brotzeit]

I asked you this before: it is the second repeating message that you want to get rid of. Not the first, right?

I'm not sure about this. I think I only want to be informed if it doesn't work as expected. If I can see in the mode line that a server is running, I don't need an additional message. What do you think ?

PS: the RLS problem doesn't seem to have anything to do with Eglot, which is just forwarding you the error message.

I know. I just wanted to mention it for completeness.

[joaotavora]

What do you think ?

I fully agree. But you still haven't confirmed exactly what message you are repeatedly seeing for which new file you open. That's the question I've asked twice. I suppose its not the one you originally mention, but the other one I presented. Please confirm this.

[brotzeit]

Sorry, it's the second line.

[eglot] Buffer is already managed by existing `guessing_game'

[brotzeit]

I copied the wrong message in the first post...

[joaotavora]

I copied the wrong message in the first post...

Yeah, I figured. But I still had to make sure, because if you hadn't it would be an indication of a much more serious problem. This is why I insisted so much with an analysis and reproduction recipe.

Anyway, I think I fixed the problem for you.

[brotzeit]

Thanks.