Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

workbook_close stack-buffer-overflow #445

Closed
wxie7 opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

workbook_close stack-buffer-overflow #445

wxie7 opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@wxie7
Copy link

wxie7 commented May 21, 2024

hello, maybe there exist a bug in workbook_close.
Below is an example

#include <xlsxwriter/workbook.h>
#include <xlsxwriter/worksheet.h>

int main() {

    /* Create a new workbook and add a worksheet. */
    lxw_workbook  *workbook  = workbook_new("demo.xlsx");
    lxw_worksheet *worksheet = workbook_add_worksheet(workbook, NULL);

    // lxw_format *format = workbook_add_format(workbook);
    // format_set_font_color(format, LXW_COLOR_RED);

    lxw_conditional_format cf = {
        .type = 1,
        .criteria = 12,
        .value = 0,
        .format = NULL
    };
    lxw_error err = worksheet_conditional_format_range(worksheet, RANGE("B1:B9"), &cf);
    if (err != LXW_NO_ERROR)
        return 1;

    workbook_close(workbook);

    return 0;
}

The following is asan information

=================================================================
==5078==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffdb9547900 at pc 0x561770102774 bp 0x7ffdb9547850 sp 0x7ffdb9547848
READ of size 8 at 0x7ffdb9547900 thread T0
    #0 0x561770102773 in _worksheet_write_cf_rule_cell /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:6746:5
    #1 0x561770101694 in _worksheet_write_cf_rule /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:6776:9
    #2 0x561770101353 in _worksheet_write_conditional_formatting /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:6845:9
    #3 0x5617700b69a2 in _worksheet_write_conditional_formats /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:6865:9
    #4 0x5617700b2b10 in lxw_worksheet_assemble_xml_file /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:7694:5
    #5 0x561770189491 in _write_worksheet_files /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/packager.c:311:9
    #6 0x561770186673 in lxw_create_package /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/packager.c:1894:13
    #7 0x561770062aff in workbook_close /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/workbook.c:2214:13
    #8 0x5617700518db in main /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/build/../bugs/bug4.cpp:24:5
    #9 0x7f8945796d8f in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16
    #10 0x7f8945796e3f in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:392:3
    #11 0x56176ff91454 in _start (/home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/build/bug4+0x58454) (BuildId: 45a7f2111caf46217f46fd5cd1ef23797eedaa35)

Address 0x7ffdb9547900 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 160 in frame
    #0 0x561770101e1f in _worksheet_write_cf_rule_cell /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:6719

  This frame has 2 object(s):
    [32, 48) 'attributes' (line 6720)
    [64, 136) 'operators' (line 6722) <== Memory access at offset 160 overflows this variable
HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
      (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow /home/ubuntu/workspace/newest-libxlsxwriter/src/worksheet.c:6746:5 in _worksheet_write_cf_rule_cell
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x1000372a0ed0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0ee0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0ef0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
  0x1000372a0f10: 00 00 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3
=>0x1000372a0f20:[f3]f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0f30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0f40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0f50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0f60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x1000372a0f70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==5078==ABORTING
@wxie7 wxie7 changed the title workbook_close stack-buffer-underflow workbook_close stack-buffer-overflow May 21, 2024
@wxie7
Copy link
Author

wxie7 commented May 21, 2024

It is also worth noting that when criteria are 16, 27, 29, 31, 33, SEGV will result. There may be other criteria to consider

@jmcnamara
Copy link
Owner

It is also worth noting that when criteria are 16, 27, 29, 31, 33, SEGV will result. There may be other criteria to consider

Thanks for the report. That is a bug. There should be validation in the function to check that conditional formats that reference strings actually have a non-NULL string.

The other issues are probably similar. I'll take a look at those too.

@jmcnamara jmcnamara self-assigned this May 21, 2024
@jmcnamara jmcnamara added the bug label May 21, 2024
@jmcnamara
Copy link
Owner

jmcnamara commented May 21, 2024

There should be validation in the function to check that conditional formats that reference strings actually have a non-NULL string.

It turns out that I did have validation in the code for this but the example abuses the API to use a TEXT criteria for a CELL conditional format.

The documentation for each conditional format type lists the allowable criteria (example). Nevertheless, the library should validate that as well. I'll add a new check.

jmcnamara added a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2024
Add extra validation to ensure that conditional formatting criteria
are valid for the given type.

Issue #445
@jmcnamara
Copy link
Owner

I've pushed a fix to main that checks that the conditional formatting criteria matches the conditional format type. Your example will now return a lxw_error and warning.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants