Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Do not merge] Use 2022-03-01-preview in sdk for some commands #1

Closed

Conversation

jiec-msft
Copy link
Owner

[Do not merge] For mason personal checking

… and re-generate the recording-test yaml files


This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

General Guidelines

  • Have you run azdev style <YOUR_EXT> locally? (pip install azdev required)
  • Have you run python scripts/ci/test_index.py -q locally?

For new extensions:

About Extension Publish

There is a pipeline to automatically build, upload and publish extension wheels.
Once your PR is merged into master branch, a new PR will be created to update src/index.json automatically.
The precondition is to put your code inside this repo and upgrade the version in the PR but do not modify src/index.json.

@jiec-msft jiec-msft changed the title [Do not merge] For mason personal checking [Do not merge] Use 2022-03-01-preview in sdk for some commands Mar 23, 2022
@jiec-msft jiec-msft changed the base branch from mason/cli_sdk_2022_03_01_pre_only to main March 24, 2022 05:03
@jiec-msft jiec-msft force-pushed the mason/use-2022-03-01-pre-sdk-for-msi-command-groups branch from 9cb5eb6 to de0e5b5 Compare March 24, 2022 05:08
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@

# TODO: Confirm this is the right version number you want and it matches your
# HISTORY.rst entry.
VERSION = '3.0.1'
# TODO(jiec): remove this version number after verification.
VERSION = '3.0.1-use-0301-api'
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will remove these 2 lines of code, add this now since I'm running CLI E2E test, need a version tag to track which version of code base I'm testing against.

@jiec-msft
Copy link
Owner Author

Close PR

@jiec-msft jiec-msft closed this Apr 1, 2022
jiec-msft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2024
* fix: --title --kind --custom-property parameters (#1)

* feat: support yaml file in register command (#3)

* fix: workspace parameter should not be required (#2)

* style: fix lint issues (#6)

* chore: update codeowner for apic-extension (#5)

* feat: revert changes to min cli version (#4)

* feat: resolve comments to CLI experience (Azure#10)

* feat: mark "apic api register" command as preview (Azure#13)

* feat: remove --terms-of-service parameter (Azure#12)

* feat: remove --workspace-name parameter (Azure#11)

* feat: support python 3.8 and 3.9 (Azure#14)

* feat: fix command descriptions (Azure#17)

* tests: add test cases for 'apic service' commands (Azure#16)

* feat: Use 03-01 spec from azure-rest-api-specs repo to regenerate CLI (Azure#19)

* fix: CLI errors (Azure#20)

* fix: import error when run CLI command

* fix: no workspace name error when run import specification command

* feat: mark some parameters as required (Azure#21)

* feat: mark --assignments parameter required for metadata commands

* doc: update sample commands

* feat: mark --source-resource-ids parameter as required for import-from-apim command

* doc: update description for import-from-apim command

* feat: bump version to 1.0.0b5 and update changelog (Azure#18)

* build: fix ci (Azure#22)

* style: fix style warnings

* test:fix test cases

* fix: service update command failure (Azure#28)

* doc: fix command samples (Azure#30)

* doc: update changelog per feedback (Azure#29)

* doc: remove extra spaces in register command help message (Azure#34)

* doc: update api definition and metadata command samples (Azure#36)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant