Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update revealjs template with newly available options #6347

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2020
Merged

Update revealjs template with newly available options #6347

merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2020

Conversation

jez
Copy link
Contributor

@jez jez commented May 7, 2020

I wanted to use an option and realized that the default pandoc template
didn't pass it through, so I went through and found all the options that
Reveal.js advertises but that Pandoc's template doesn't support.

https://github.com/hakimel/reveal.js#configuration

I also noticed that rollingLinks isn't a setting anymore, but it's fine
to keep it in the template because people might be using an old version
of Reveal.js (via revealjs-url) that still has this option.

I wanted to use an option and realized that the default pandoc template
didn't pass it through, so I went through and found all the options that
Reveal.js advertises but that Pandoc's template doesn't support.

<https://github.com/hakimel/reveal.js#configuration>

I also noticed that rollingLinks isn't a setting anymore, but it's fine
to keep it in the template because people might be using an old version
of Reveal.js (via `revealjs-url`) that still has this option.
@jgm jgm merged commit e7ac57d into jgm:master May 7, 2020
@jgm
Copy link
Owner

jgm commented May 7, 2020

Thanks. In retrospect, I should probably have put all these variables under revealjs namespaces. Maybe a bad idea to change that now, though.

@jez jez deleted the jez-revealjs-options branch May 7, 2020 18:42
@jez
Copy link
Contributor Author

jez commented May 7, 2020

Thanks. In retrospect, I should probably have put all these variables under revealjs namespaces. Maybe a bad idea to change that now, though.

Yeah, it might pose potential problems; there's no real versioning built into the templates. Though it's probably something that can be put off until it manifests concretely as a problem (easier to solve a problem when you can see it!)

By the way, if you have a second I'd love your input on the other PR I have open: #6342

Thanks again! Huge fan of pandoc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants