Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

Bias for stability instead of downwards bias #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2015

Conversation

luziusmeisser
Copy link
Contributor

The current proposal counts absent/missing votes as votes for 1M.

In order to save a few bytes, it would be better to let absent votes default to whatever the most likely vote is, namely the current value. That way, miners who are happy with the current limit do not need to vote constantly.

@jgarzik
Copy link
Owner

jgarzik commented Sep 3, 2015

ACK, consensus, merged.

jgarzik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2015
Bias for stability instead of downwards bias
@jgarzik jgarzik merged commit d7f0541 into jgarzik:master Sep 3, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants