Cocoapods support for audit

[barv-jfrog]

• The pull request is targeting the dev branch.
• The code has been validated to compile successfully by running go vet ./....
• The code has been formatted properly using go fmt ./....
• All static analysis checks passed.
• All tests have passed. If this feature is not already covered by the tests, new tests have been added.
• All changes are detailed at the description. if not already covered at JFrog Documentation, new documentation have been added.

---

Description:
jf audit for cocoapods package manager

---

Depends on:
jfrog/jfrog-cli-core#1274

---

audit example on nanopb package in a cocoapods project:

---

Minimum pod version - 1.15.2

[attiasas]

Nice, take a look at my comments:

1. Add integration tests to artifactory_test.go
2. Add integraion tests to audit_test.go
3. Add screen shot of the table results running on a cocoapods project to the PR details

[attiasas]

why its any? is it not used for objective C / swift languages?
Is there a Cocoapods Lang that is used in the files?

[srmish-jfrog]

Cocoapods actually houses packages built with many languages, not just ObjC / Swift

[attiasas]

please add this as a comment above.
Change the name of the const to Any / Multiple

[barv-jfrog]

ok

[attiasas]

what is this? why is missing-context related to this PR?

[srmish-jfrog]

Will be removed from PR

[attiasas]

Do we have to install everytime? what if the user already have Podfile.lock?

[srmish-jfrog]

Will add a test to skip installation if Podfile.lock exists and has newer ModTime than Podfile

[github-actions]

Merging this branch will not change overall coverage

Impacted Packages	Coverage Δ	🤖
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security	0.00% (ø)
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/commands/audit	0.00% (ø)
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/commands/audit/sca/cocoapods	0.00% (ø)
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/tests	0.00% (ø)
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/tests/utils/integration	0.00% (ø)
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/utils/techutils	0.00% (ø)

---

Coverage by file

Changed files (no unit tests)

Changed File	Coverage Δ	Total	Covered	Missed	🤖
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/commands/audit/sca/cocoapods/cocoapods.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/commands/audit/sca/cocoapods/podcommand.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/commands/audit/scarunner.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/tests/config.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/tests/consts.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/tests/utils/integration/test_integrationutils.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0
github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/utils/techutils/techutils.go	0.00% (ø)	0	0	0

Please note that the "Total", "Covered", and "Missed" counts above refer to code statements instead of lines of code. The value in brackets refers to the test coverage of that file in the old version of the code.

Changed unit test files

• github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/artifactory_test.go
• github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/audit_test.go
• github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli-security/commands/audit/sca/cocoapods/cocoapods_test.go