Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos / V3 anticipatory renames #149
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Renaming brought forward from #144 in order to reduce knock on effects of renames that will come in the Cosmos V3 SDK timeframe
ConnectionMode.DirectTcp->Direct(V3 is introducing an enum as we presaged, but the name is more ... direct) #reConnectionPolicy->ClientOptions(this is the type name in V3 and better describes the real purpose; usage is minimal at present, as it's mainly used by Propulsion and/or dotnet-templates internally)Collection->Container- See rename Collection -> Container #148 - this name is being used consistently elsewhere nowDocumentDb/DocDb->CosmosDB