Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backfill 22.x docs #5822

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 27, 2018
Merged

Backfill 22.x docs #5822

merged 8 commits into from
Mar 27, 2018

Conversation

rickhanlonii
Copy link
Member

Summary

This PR backfills docs for Jest 22, removes all "available in Jest x.x", and adds a "<=22" doc area for all previous versions

Note: Jest <=22 still includes the "available in Jest" messages

Screenshot

@thymikee
Copy link
Collaborator

We need a way to push the versioned docs to the gh-pages branch only, the repo is growing quite big now.

@rickhanlonii
Copy link
Member Author

This should also fix #5824

@mjesun what do you think about getting this in and moving the versioned docs off master in a later pull?

@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ files:
'vi': 'vi'
'zh-CN': 'zh-Hans'
'zh-TW': 'zh-Hant'
-
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this will fix the langs according to https://docusaurus.io/docs/en/translation.html#versioned-translations

@rickhanlonii rickhanlonii requested a review from mjesun March 27, 2018 13:28
@mjesun mjesun merged commit 5bd6ee1 into jestjs:master Mar 27, 2018
@rickhanlonii rickhanlonii deleted the rh-backdate-docs branch March 27, 2018 16:30
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants