Skip to content

Check whether the aligned pointers value of the internal properties c… #1033

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

robertsipka
Copy link
Contributor

…an be stored directly

in ecma_value_t or not.

This change affects those internal properties that haven't been checked previously.

JerryScript-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Robert Sipka rsipka.uszeged@partner.samsung.com

@LaszloLango
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the format of the commit message.

@LaszloLango LaszloLango added the enhancement An improvement label Apr 26, 2016
@robertsipka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, I've updated the commit message.

@zherczeg
Copy link
Member

Patch is ok, but I would prefer a bit better description of the commit message.

…an be stored directly in ecma_value_t.

Those internal properties which have a primitive value field or where the property value type
is an ecma_object_t ptr were checked earlier.

JerryScript-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Robert Sipka rsipka.uszeged@partner.samsung.com
@robertsipka robertsipka force-pushed the internal_property branch from e6f92b5 to 19b972b Compare May 2, 2016 09:09
@robertsipka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review, I've updated the commit message, and I've rebased this patch with the current master.

@zherczeg
Copy link
Member

zherczeg commented May 2, 2016

LGTM

1 similar comment
@LaszloLango
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@LaszloLango LaszloLango merged commit 19b972b into jerryscript-project:master May 2, 2016
@robertsipka robertsipka deleted the internal_property branch November 24, 2016 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants