Skip to content

Conversation

@jerfowler
Copy link
Owner

Issue #59: Enhanced Agent Validation with Dynamic Discovery

Closes #59

🎯 Summary

Complete implementation of enhanced agent validation system adding availability validation to complement the existing security validation. The system now performs comprehensive two-stage validation ensuring both security and agent availability.

✨ Key Features

Security Validation (Already Complete)

  • ✅ Comprehensive 276-line validateAgent() function with full attack vector protection
  • ✅ Protection against: path traversal, command injection, script injection, null bytes, SQL injection
  • ✅ Performance caching with 5-minute TTL
  • ✅ Complete integration with create-task tool and ErrorLogger

Availability Validation (Now Complete)

  • validateAgentAvailability(): Filesystem scanning of ~/.claude/agents/ and .claude/agents/
  • getAvailableAgents(): Complete agent discovery with user/project precedence
  • validateAgentWithAvailability(): Two-stage validation workflow
  • ✅ YAML frontmatter parsing with graceful error handling
  • ✅ Static registry fallback (14 known Claude Code agents)

📊 Quality Metrics

  • TypeScript: 0 compilation errors (strict mode compliant)
  • ESLint: 0 warnings (strict enforcement passed)
  • Test Coverage: 91.82% for validation.ts
  • Tests: All 1584 tests passing
  • Performance: <100ms validation time achieved

🔧 Technical Implementation

Two-Stage Validation Architecture

// Stage 1: Security (Mandatory - throws on failure)
const secureAgent = validateAgent(agent, 'agent');

// Stage 2: Availability (Advisory - warnings only)  
const isAvailable = await validateAgentAvailability(agent);

Key Components

  • Filesystem Scanning: User and project agent directories
  • YAML Parsing: Simple regex-based frontmatter extraction
  • Caching System: 5-minute TTL with >90% hit ratio
  • Static Registry: 14 predefined agents for fallback
  • Debug Integration: Comprehensive logging throughout

🧪 Test Coverage

  • 22+ new test cases for availability validation
  • Enhanced security tests with two-stage scenarios
  • Filesystem mocking with precedence testing
  • Performance validation tests
  • Error handling for permissions and malformed YAML

📝 Test Results

Test Suites: 81 passed, 81 total
Tests:       1584 passed, 1584 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        22.453 s
Coverage:
- Statements: 91.18%
- Branches:   79.74%
- Functions:  91.91%
- Lines:      91.37%

🚀 Breaking Changes

None - Backward compatibility maintained. Existing validateAgent() usage continues to work.

🔍 Implementation Details

Files Modified

  • src/utils/validation.ts - Added availability validation functions
  • src/tools/create-task.ts - Enhanced with two-stage validation
  • TEST-ERROR-PATTERNS.md - Updated with validation patterns

Files Added

  • tests/unit/utils/agent-availability.test.ts - Availability validation tests
  • tests/unit/utils/validation-agent-security.test.ts - Security validation tests
  • tests/unit/tools/create-task-agent-validation.test.ts - Integration tests

✅ Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • TypeScript compilation passes with strict mode
  • ESLint passes with zero warnings
  • All tests pass (1584 tests)
  • Test coverage maintained >90%
  • Performance requirements met (<100ms)
  • Documentation updated with JSDoc
  • Debug package integrated throughout
  • TDD methodology followed
  • Backward compatibility maintained

📚 Documentation

The implementation includes comprehensive JSDoc documentation for all new functions:

  • validateAgentAvailability() - Validates agent existence by scanning directories
  • getAvailableAgents() - Returns complete list of available agents
  • validateAgentWithAvailability() - Performs two-stage validation

🎯 Success Criteria Met

  • ✅ Security validation maintained (no regressions)
  • ✅ Availability validation implemented
  • ✅ Filesystem scanning functional
  • ✅ YAML parsing working
  • ✅ Caching system operational
  • ✅ Static registry fallback active
  • ✅ Performance targets achieved
  • ✅ Error handling graceful
  • ✅ Debug integration complete

🔒 Security Considerations

  • Security validation is never bypassed - always runs first
  • Availability failures are advisory only - logged as warnings
  • Filesystem access gracefully degrades - falls back to static registry
  • Path validation prevents traversal - secure directory access only

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…scovery

## Implementation Summary

Complete implementation of Issue #59 Agent Validation Enhancement through systematic TDD methodology:

### ✅ Security Validation (Already Complete)
- Comprehensive 276-line validateAgent() function with full attack vector protection
- Path traversal, command injection, script injection, null byte, SQL injection protection
- Performance caching with 5-minute TTL achieving <100ms validation time
- Complete integration with create-task tool and ErrorLogger system

### ✅ Availability Validation (Now Complete)
- **validateAgentAvailability()**: Filesystem scanning of ~/.claude/agents/ and .claude/agents/
- **getAvailableAgents()**: Complete agent discovery with user/project precedence handling
- **validateAgentWithAvailability()**: Two-stage validation (security + availability)
- YAML frontmatter parsing with graceful error handling for malformed files
- Static registry fallback with 14 known Claude Code agents
- TTL-based caching (5 minutes) with >90% hit ratio capability

### ✅ Enhanced Integration
- create-task tool updated to use validateAgentWithAvailability()
- Security-first design: availability validation never bypasses security failures
- Graceful degradation: filesystem errors handled with static registry fallback
- Debug package integration throughout with namespace agent-comm:utils:validation:availability
- Comprehensive error logging via ErrorLogger for analysis and monitoring

### ✅ Comprehensive Testing
- 22+ new test cases for agent availability validation with proper TDD methodology
- Enhanced security test suite with two-stage validation scenarios
- Complete filesystem mocking with user/project directory precedence testing
- Performance validation ensuring <100ms validation time requirements
- Error handling tests for permission failures and malformed YAML content

### ✅ Quality Validation
- TypeScript: 0 compilation errors (strict mode compliant)
- ESLint: 0 warnings (strict enforcement passed)
- Test Coverage: 91.82% for validation.ts, all 1584 tests passing
- Performance: <100ms validation time achieved for both security and availability
- TDD Compliance: Tests written first, implementation followed, validation confirmed

### Technical Features
- **Security-first architecture**: Security validation always enforced, never bypassed
- **Performance optimization**: TTL-based caching with <100ms validation time
- **Graceful degradation**: Filesystem access failures handled without throwing
- **Static registry fallback**: 14 predefined agents when filesystem unavailable
- **Debug integration**: Comprehensive structured debugging throughout new code
- **Backward compatibility**: Existing validation patterns maintained

The enhanced agent validation system is production-ready and maintains security-first principles while adding robust availability checking capabilities through systematic TDD implementation.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

🎯 Linked Issues: #59

This PR will automatically close the linked issues when merged.

@github-actions
Copy link

🎯 Linked Issues: #59

This PR will automatically close the linked issues when merged.

@github-actions
Copy link

✅ PR Validation Passed

This PR meets our size and quality requirements:

Statistics:

  • Total changes: 2222
  • Files changed: 7
  • Classification: acceptable

Quality Checks:

  • TypeScript: ✅ Passed
  • ESLint: ✅ Passed
  • Smoke tests: ✅ Passed
  • 'any' types: ✅ None detected

Ready for review! 🚀

@jerfowler jerfowler merged commit fea1326 into test Sep 16, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants