forked from nemccarthy/stash-pullrequest-builder-plugin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
StashBuilds.java : try again before asking to "PLEASE SET JENKINS ROOT URL… #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
422eab9
StashBuilds.java : try again before asking to "PLEASE SET JENKINS ROO…
jimklimov ee35b3f
StashBuilds.java : first try to load() the global config into our obj…
jimklimov 2b229e5
Just use JenkinsLocationConfiguration.get() per recommendations
jimklimov 1d1b45b
fix nullness
jakub-bochenski File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ public void onCompleted(AbstractBuild build, TaskListener listener) { | |
return; | ||
} | ||
Result result = build.getResult(); | ||
JenkinsLocationConfiguration globalConfig = new JenkinsLocationConfiguration(); | ||
String rootUrl = globalConfig.getUrl(); | ||
// Note: current code should no longer use "new JenkinsLocationConfiguration()" | ||
// as only one instance per runtime is really supported by the current core. | ||
JenkinsLocationConfiguration globalConfig = JenkinsLocationConfiguration.get(); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We need to add a null check or upgrade to newer jenkins dependency. My vote is for the former, since the later would reduce compatibility. |
||
String rootUrl = globalConfig == null ? null : globalConfig.getUrl(); | ||
String buildUrl = ""; | ||
if (rootUrl == null) { | ||
buildUrl = " PLEASE SET JENKINS ROOT URL FROM GLOBAL CONFIGURATION " + build.getUrl(); | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would recommend removing this comment seems like it adds no value, the reasoning behind the change can be in the commit message or the PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, to many newcomers (like myself not so long ago) the code is the documentation. A removed line carries no visibility to
git blame
, not that many people dig in that at all, and a checked-out workspace or a fork has no data from PR discussions. For this particular piece of code, I found too many examples collecting dust on the internet over many years proposing thenew
way to get the config, that without the comment someone might be eager to make this particular mistake again.